• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
刘洋,李凯旋,王金花,等. 两种方式电烤箱烤鸭腿肉的营养品质与风味物质比较[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(21):316−326. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010040.
引用本文: 刘洋,李凯旋,王金花,等. 两种方式电烤箱烤鸭腿肉的营养品质与风味物质比较[J]. 食品工业科技,2023,44(21):316−326. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010040.
LIU Yang, LI Kaixuan, WANG Jinhua, et al. Comparison of Nutritional Quality and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Duck Leg Meat Roasted by Electric Oven with Two Roasting Methods[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(21): 316−326. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010040.
Citation: LIU Yang, LI Kaixuan, WANG Jinhua, et al. Comparison of Nutritional Quality and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Duck Leg Meat Roasted by Electric Oven with Two Roasting Methods[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2023, 44(21): 316−326. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2023010040.

两种方式电烤箱烤鸭腿肉的营养品质与风味物质比较

Comparison of Nutritional Quality and Volatile Flavor Compounds of Duck Leg Meat Roasted by Electric Oven with Two Roasting Methods

  • 摘要: 为探究烤制方式对电烤箱烤鸭腿肉品质的影响,采用直接烤、包锡纸烤两种方式烤制鸭腿肉,分析比较两种烤鸭腿肉的感官特性、烹饪损失、脂肪酸和氨基酸组成及挥发性风味构成。结果表明:直接烤制的鸭腿肉烤香味好、烹饪损失高;包锡纸烤肉更嫩,烹饪损失低。两种方式烤制后肉的脂肪酸和氨基酸含量均增加,而直接烤制方式的营养指标(多不饱和脂肪酸/饱和脂肪酸值、必需氨基酸/总氨基酸值)相对更好。采用顶空固相微萃取/气相色谱-质谱联用分析两烤鸭腿肉,共鉴定出44种挥发性化合物,从直接烤样品中检测到的醛类、醇类、酮类等挥发性化合物均多于包锡纸烤样品。正交偏最小二乘判别数据分析显示十六碳醛、辛醛、十四碳醛、(E,E)-2,4-癸二烯醛、戊醛、己醛等(VIP>1)可作为区分两样品挥发性组成的标志性化合物。采用稀释法气相色谱-嗅闻分析共鉴定出22种气味活性化合物,数量最多的为醛类化合物,其次为含硫类、吡嗪类化合物。两样品的气味活性化合物种类类似,但具有不同的稀释因子。选择稀释因子高且有代表性气味特征的化合物绘制雷达图比较,得到与感官评价一致的结果,即直接烤制样品的风味和谐,烤肉香和脂肪香突出。

     

    Abstract: The present work was to compare quality differences of the duck leg roasted with or without tinfoil paper wrapping using electric oven. The sensory characteristics, cooking loss, fatty acids, amino acids, and volatile flavor composition in the meat of the two roasted duck leg samples were analyzed. In comparison, the duck leg roasted without tinfoil paper wrapping had greater roasted aroma and cooking loss, while that with paper wrapping was more tender and had lower cooking loss. No matter with or without tinfoil paper wrapping, both fatty acid contents and amino acid contents in the meat were increased after roasting. The sample roasted without tinfoil paper wrapping had higher values in polyunsaturated fatty acids content to saturated fatty acids content (PUFA/SFA) and essential amino acid content to total amino acid content (EAA/TAA). Head-space solid phase microextraction and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME/GC-MS) analysis identified in total 44 volatile compounds in the two samples while those like aldehydes, alcohols, ketones, etc. had greater amounts in the sample roasted without tinfoil paper wrapping. Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA) suggested that hexadecanal, octanal, tetradecanal, (E,E)-2,4-decadienal, pentanal, hexanal, etc. (VIP>1) could be markers to differentiate volatile flavor composition of the two samples. Moreover, gas chromatography-olfactometry of aroma extract dilution analysis (AEDA/GC-O) identified 22 odor-active compounds (i.e. odorants) in the two samples with aldehydes being the highest number followed by sulfur-containing compounds and pyrazines. Overall, the odor-active compounds found by GC-O were similar in the two samples whereas they had different flavor dilution factors. Then aroma profile of the two samples was compared by radar charts based on the compounds of higher dilution factors representing the roasted duck leg odors. It suggested harmonious and more prominent roasted and fatty aromas pertaining to the sample without tinfoil paper wrapping, which agreed with the sensory analysis results.

     

/

返回文章
返回