• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
黄勇刚,杨铮,贺奕森,等. 山药益生菌发酵工艺优化及干燥工艺研究J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(12):1−12. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025050085.
引用本文: 黄勇刚,杨铮,贺奕森,等. 山药益生菌发酵工艺优化及干燥工艺研究J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(12):1−12. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025050085.
HUANG Yonggang, YANG Zheng, HE Yisen, et al. Study on Optimization of Fermentation Process and Drying Process of Yam ProbioticsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(12): 1−12. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025050085.
Citation: HUANG Yonggang, YANG Zheng, HE Yisen, et al. Study on Optimization of Fermentation Process and Drying Process of Yam ProbioticsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(12): 1−12. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025050085.

山药益生菌发酵工艺优化及干燥工艺研究

Study on Optimization of Fermentation Process and Drying Process of Yam Probiotics

  • 摘要: 研究以保定祁山药为原料,接种植物乳植杆菌(Lactiplantibacillus plantarum)进行发酵,以山药粉中的活菌数和感官评价得分为指标,通过对发酵工艺参数进行单因素实验与响应面优化试验,研究发酵山药的最佳发酵工艺参数。采用冷冻干燥、喷雾干燥、微波干燥和热风干燥对发酵山药进行制粉,从水分含量、堆积密度、多糖含量、总多酚含量、总黄酮含量、菌株存活量和淀粉消化性质方面对四种干燥方式制备的益生菌发酵山药粉品质进行评价,选择最适合发酵山药干燥制粉的方法。结果表明,发酵山药的最佳制备工艺为接菌量2%、发酵时间48 h、发酵温度37 ℃,此时发酵山药中的活菌数最高同时具有最高的感官评价得分,分别为9.07 lg(CFU/mL)和91.36分。益生菌发酵可以显著增加山药粉中多糖、总多酚、总黄酮、抗消化淀粉(Resistant Starch,RS)的含量(P<0.05),同时可以显著降低快消化淀粉(Rapidly Digestible Starch,RDS)的含量(P<0.05)。冷冻干燥制备的山药粉品质最好,喷雾干燥次之,微波干燥制备的山药粉虽然有最高的总多酚和总黄酮含量,但是其会严重降低山药中的多糖含量。微波干燥和热风干燥在干燥样品的同时会大量杀灭山药粉中的益生菌,降低了成品的品质。这些表明,益生菌发酵山药可以显著提升山药的品质,四种干燥方式中冷冻干燥和喷雾干燥相比于微波干燥和热风干燥更适合于益生菌发酵山药粉的制备。

     

    Abstract: In this study, Baoding Qishan yam was used as the raw material, and Lactiplantibacillus plantarum was inoculated for fermentation. With the viable count in yam powder and sensory evaluation score as indicators, the optimal fermentation parameters for fermented yam were investigated via single-factor experiments and response surface optimization experiments on fermentation process parameters. Subsequently, fermented yam was powdered by freeze-drying, spray-drying, microwave drying, and hot-air drying. The quality of probiotic yam powder prepared by the four drying methods was evaluated based on moisture content, bulk density, polysaccharide content, total polyphenol content, total flavonoid content, viable count, and starch digestibility, so as to select the most suitable method for drying and powdering of fermented yam. The results showed that the optimal preparation process for fermented yam was determined as follows: Inoculum size of 2%, fermentation time of 48 h, and fermentation temperature of 37 ℃. Under these conditions, the highest viable count and the highest sensory evaluation score in fermented yam were achieved, which were 9.07 lg (CFU/mL) and 91.36 points, respectively. Probiotic fermentation could significantly increase the contents of polysaccharides, total polyphenols, total flavonoids, and resistant starch (RS) in yam powder (P<0.05), while significantly (P<0.05) reduced the content of rapidly digestible starch (RDS). The quality of yam powder prepared by freeze-drying was the best, followed by that prepared by spray-drying. Although yam powder prepared by microwave drying had the highest total polyphenol and total flavonoid contents, it severely reduced the polysaccharide content in yam. Microwave drying and hot-air drying, while drying the samples, killed a large number of probiotics in yam powder, thus reducing the quality of the final product. These results suggested that probiotic-fermented yam could significantly improve the quality of yam, and among the four drying methods, freeze-drying and spray-drying were more suitable for the preparation of probiotic yam powder compared with microwave drying and hot-air drying.

     

/

返回文章
返回