• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
王贾杰,张昊,胥福勋,等. 预处理方式对绵羊皮明胶凝胶特性的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(19):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080262.
引用本文: 王贾杰,张昊,胥福勋,等. 预处理方式对绵羊皮明胶凝胶特性的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(19):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080262.
WANG Jiajie, ZHANG Hao, XU Fuxun, et al. Impact of Pretreatment Methods of the Properties of Sheepskin Gelatin GelJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(19): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080262.
Citation: WANG Jiajie, ZHANG Hao, XU Fuxun, et al. Impact of Pretreatment Methods of the Properties of Sheepskin Gelatin GelJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(19): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080262.

预处理方式对绵羊皮明胶凝胶特性的影响

Impact of Pretreatment Methods of the Properties of Sheepskin Gelatin Gel

  • 摘要: 本研究以脱毛绵羊皮为研究对象,系统探究酸法、酶法及超声处理等不同预处理方法联合热水提取对所提取明胶的提取效果、结构特征、理化性质、流变特性、凝胶特性以及功能特性的影响,以期筛选羊皮明胶制备的最优预处理方式。结果表明,超声预处理的提取率最高(65.13%),显著高于酸法(42.31%)和酶法(36.62%)(P<0.05);纯度方面,酸法最高(92.4%),超声法次之(90%)。结构分析显示,超声组具有最完整的胶原特征结构:SDS-PAGE中α链清晰,FTIR表明氢键保留较多,CD测得α-螺旋含量达37.5%,显著高于酸法(5.3%)与酶法(10.6%)(P<0.05)。在流变与凝胶性能方面,超声组熔融温度(39~42.7 ℃)、动态黏度、高分子量组分比例(≥10 kDa占75.68%)及凝胶强度(273.7 g)均优于其余两组。功能特性方面,超声组的乳化性(12.46 m2/g)、乳化稳定性(842.13 min)、起泡性(140.65%)和起泡稳定性(20.94%)均显著更优(P<0.05)。不同预处理方式对氨基酸组成无显著影响(P>0.05),均以甘氨酸和脯氨酸为主要氨基酸。综上,超声预处理可在提高提取效率的同时保持较高结构完整性并显著增强凝胶与界面特性,是制备高品质绵羊皮明胶的优选工艺,为其在食品工业中的应用提供技术依据。

     

    Abstract: This study investigated the effects of three distinct pre-extraction treatments—acid, enzymatic and ultrasonic—combined with hot-water extraction on the yield, structural features, physicochemical properties, rheological behaviour, gel strength and functional performance of gelatin derived from dehaired sheep skins, with the aim of identifying an optimal processing strategy. Ultrasonic pretreatment produced the highest extraction yield (65.13%), significantly exceeding that of acid (42.31%) and enzymatic treatments (36.62%) (P<0.05). In contrast, acid pretreatment yielded the highest purity (92.4%), followed by the ultrasonic method (90%). Structural analyses revealed that gelatin from the ultrasonic group retained the most intact collagen architecture: SDS–PAGE showed well-defined α-chains, FTIR spectra indicated greater hydrogen-bond preservation, and circular dichroism analysis revealed an α-helix content of 37.5%, markedly higher than those of the acid (5.3%) and enzymatic (10.6%) groups (P<0.05).In terms of rheological and gel-forming properties, the ultrasonic group displayed superior melting temperature (39~42.7 ℃), dynamic viscosity, a higher proportion of high-molecular-weight fractions (≥10 kDa, 75.68%) and greater gel strength (273.7 g). Its functional attributes—including emulsifying activity (12.46 m2/g), emulsion stability (842.13 min), foaming capacity (140.65%) and foam stability (20.94%)—were also significantly enhanced relative to the other treatments (P<0.05). Amino-acid profiles did not differ significantly among treatments (P>0.05), with glycine and proline remaining predominant. Collectively, these findings demonstrate that ultrasonic pretreatment simultaneously improves extraction efficiency, preserves molecular integrity and markedly enhances both gelation and interfacial properties, establishing it as a preferred strategy for producing high-quality sheep-skin gelatin and supporting its broader application in the food industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回