• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
张玉华, 孟一, 姜沛宏, 张应龙, 张咏梅. 近红外技术对不同动物来源肉掺假的检测[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, (03): 316-319. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.058
引用本文: 张玉华, 孟一, 姜沛宏, 张应龙, 张咏梅. 近红外技术对不同动物来源肉掺假的检测[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, (03): 316-319. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.058
ZHANG Yu- hua, MENG Yi, JIANG Pei-hong, ZHANG Ying-long, ZHANG Yong-mei. Detection of adulteration of animal meats from different sources by near infrared technology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (03): 316-319. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.058
Citation: ZHANG Yu- hua, MENG Yi, JIANG Pei-hong, ZHANG Ying-long, ZHANG Yong-mei. Detection of adulteration of animal meats from different sources by near infrared technology[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (03): 316-319. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.03.058

近红外技术对不同动物来源肉掺假的检测

Detection of adulteration of animal meats from different sources by near infrared technology

  • 摘要: 采用近红外光谱结合主成分分析法(PCA)、判别分析法,分别建立了牛肉和羊肉中掺杂其它动物肉的定性鉴别模型,根据鉴别准确率评价模型的预测性能。采用近红外光谱结合PCA、偏最小二乘法(PLS),建立了掺假物的定量检测模型,根据模型对预测集样品的预测均方差(RMSEP)以及预测值与实测值间的相关系数(r)验证模型的预测能力。结果,牛肉掺猪肉模型对训练集和预测集的鉴别准确率分别为97.86%和91.23%,羊肉掺猪肉模型对训练集和预测集的鉴别准确率分别为98.28%和92.98%,羊肉掺鸭肉模型对训练集和预测集的鉴别准确率分别为99.59%和93.97%,羊肉掺假模型对训练集和预测集的鉴别准确率分别为97.57%和90.76%。牛肉掺假定量模型对训练集的交互验证均方差(RMSECV)和预测集的RMSEP分别为3.87%和4.13%,r分别为0.9505和0.9134;羊肉掺假定量模型对训练集的RMSECV和预测集的RMSEP分别为4.48%和4.86%,r分别为0.9306和0.9082。表明近红外技术结合一定的化学计量学方法可实现不同动物来源肉掺假的鉴别,且能够对掺假物进行定量检测。 

     

    Abstract: Qualitative identification models of beef and mutton adulterated with other animals meat were established by near infrared spectroscopy( NIR) combined with principal component analysis( PCA) and discriminant analysis.The performance of the models was evaluated according to identification accuracy. Quantitative detection models of adulterated content were established by NIR combined with PCA and partial least squares( PLS). Predictive ability of the models was verified by prediction mean square error( RMSEP) and correlation coefficient( r) between the predicted values and the measured values.As a result,the accuracy of the training set and prediction set were97.86% and 91.23% respectively identified by the model of beef adulterated with pork.The accuracy of the training set and prediction set were 98.28% and 92.98% respectively identified by the model of mutton adulterated with pork.The accuracy of the training set and prediction set were 99.59% and 93.97% respectively identified by the model of mutton adulterated with duck meat.The accuracy of the training set and prediction set were 97.57% and90.76% respectively identified by the model of mutton adulteration. Interaction validation of mean square error( RMSECV) of training set samples and RMSEP of prediction set samples of beef adulterated quantitative model were 3.87% and 4.13%,and r were 0.9505 and 0.9134 respectively.RMSECV of training set samples and RMSEP of prediction set samples of mutton adulterated quantitative model were 4.48% and 4.86%,and r were 0.9306 and0.9082 respectively. The results showed that near infrared technology in combination with certain chemometrics methods can identify adulteration of animal meat from different sources,and can detect adulteration quantity.

     

/

返回文章
返回