• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
郑凤锦, 刘国明, 李杰民, 卫萍, 盛金凤, 孙健, 李丽, 零东宁. 香蕉酸奶的工艺优化及质构特性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, (06): 299-303. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.06.057
引用本文: 郑凤锦, 刘国明, 李杰民, 卫萍, 盛金凤, 孙健, 李丽, 零东宁. 香蕉酸奶的工艺优化及质构特性研究[J]. 食品工业科技, 2015, (06): 299-303. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.06.057
ZHENG Feng-jin, LIU Guo-ming, LI Jie-min, WEI Ping, SHENG Jin-feng, SUN Jian, LI Li, LING Dong-ning. Optimization processes and textural properties study of banana yogurt[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (06): 299-303. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.06.057
Citation: ZHENG Feng-jin, LIU Guo-ming, LI Jie-min, WEI Ping, SHENG Jin-feng, SUN Jian, LI Li, LING Dong-ning. Optimization processes and textural properties study of banana yogurt[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2015, (06): 299-303. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2015.06.057

香蕉酸奶的工艺优化及质构特性研究

Optimization processes and textural properties study of banana yogurt

  • 摘要: 以香蕉酸奶为研究对象,在单因素实验的基础上,选取乳酸菌添加量、发酵温度、发酵时间为自变量,感官评定得分为响应值,利用Box-Behnken中心组合设计原理和响应面分析法,对香蕉酸奶的发酵工艺进行优化。确定其最优工艺参数为乳酸菌添加量0.1%、发酵温度40℃、发酵时间7.6h,感官评分可达15.19。建立质构特性与感官得分之间的线性回归模型为:y(感官评定得分)=18.114-0.157x1(硬度)-3.211x2(粘性)-0.324x4(弹性)。 

     

    Abstract: In this study,the banana yogurt was used as the research object and the sensory evaluation score was used as a measure indicator. For achieving the maximal sensory evaluation score,three fermentation parameters,including lactobacillus addition,fermentation temperature and fermentation time,were optimized using the Box-Behnken central composite design and the response surface methodology was based on single factor investigations. The optimum process parameters were lactobacillus addition 0.1%,fermentation temperature40℃,fermentation time 7.6h and sensory evaluation scores 15.19. The linear regression model between textural properties and sensory evaluation scores was y(sensory evaluation scores) =18.114-0.157x1( hardness)-3.211x2(adhesiveness)-0.324x4(springiness).

     

/

返回文章
返回