• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
张霁红, 康三江, 曾朝珍, 张海燕, 宋娟. 不同浸提方法对苦水玫瑰浸提效果的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(11): 200-204. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.11.035
引用本文: 张霁红, 康三江, 曾朝珍, 张海燕, 宋娟. 不同浸提方法对苦水玫瑰浸提效果的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(11): 200-204. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.11.035
ZHANG Ji-hong, KANG San-jiang, ZENG Chao-zhen, ZHANG Hai-yan, SONG Juan. Effect of different extracting methods on the extraction of Ku-shui rose[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(11): 200-204. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.11.035
Citation: ZHANG Ji-hong, KANG San-jiang, ZENG Chao-zhen, ZHANG Hai-yan, SONG Juan. Effect of different extracting methods on the extraction of Ku-shui rose[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(11): 200-204. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.11.035

不同浸提方法对苦水玫瑰浸提效果的影响

Effect of different extracting methods on the extraction of Ku-shui rose

  • 摘要: 为开发苦水玫瑰新型饮料,对不同浸提方法及工艺进行研究以提高玫瑰花的浸提效果。根据正交实验和极差分析,对常规、微波、超声波等提取方法中的物料粒径、料液比、提取时间、提取温度等因素进行优化组合,以浸提液中玫瑰花色素含量为指标,确定出玫瑰花不同浸提方法的较优工艺。结果表明:玫瑰常规浸提最佳工艺参数为:物料粉碎度60 目,料液比1:40,提取温度90 ℃,提取时间30 min,浸提液中玫瑰色素的吸光值为0.8623。微波浸提最佳工艺参数为:物料粉碎度60 目,料液比1:40,微波浸提时间3.5 min,浸提液中玫瑰色素的吸光值为0.8103。苦水玫瑰超声波浸提工艺的最佳工艺参数为:物料粉碎度60 目,料液比1:40,提取温度80 ℃,提取时间20 min,浸提液中玫瑰色素的吸光值为0.9421。对比几种浸提方法的提取率、VC、花色素与香茅醇、苯乙醇的含量,结果显示:超声波浸提法的提取率45.32%±0.850%、VC含量(386.00±32.35) μg/mL、花色素520 nm下的吸光值0.9761±0.069最高,微波浸提香茅醇体积分数0.0124%±0.003%、苯乙醇体积分数0.0498%±0.002%最大。故超声波、微波浸提法较好地保留了苦水玫瑰的特有成分,可为开发苦水玫瑰饮料新产品提供依据。

     

    Abstract: In order to develop new beverage of Ku-shui rose and improve the extraction of Ku-shui rose, different extraction methods and process were studied. According to the orthogonal experiment and range analysis, the size of raw material, material liquid ratio, extraction time and temperature of different extraction methods of conventional, microwave and ultrasonic were optimized and the optimum extraction of different extraction methods of roses were determined with indexs of the content of rose pigment in the extract.The results showed that the best process parameters of the conventional rose water extraction was material crushing degree of 60 mesh, material liquid ratio of 1:40, extraction temperature 90℃, extracting time for 30 min, absorbance of anthocyanins was 0.8623 in the rose extraction.The microwave extraction process was material crushing degree 60 mesh, liquid ratio of 1:40, microwave extraction time for 3.5 min, absorbance of anthocyanins was 0.8103 in the rose extraction.The best process parameters of the ultrasonic extraction was material crushing degree of 60 mesh, material liquid ratio of 1:40, extraction temperature 80℃, extracting time for 20 min, absorbance of anthocyanins was 0.9421 in the rose extraction. The extraction rate, VC, anthocyanin and main aroma compounds of different extraction methods were compared. The results showed that the extraction rate of ultrasonic extraction was 45.32%±0.850%, the content of VC was (386.00±32.35) μg/mL, and the content of anthocyanins (520 nm absorbance) was 0.9761±0.069, the volume fraction of citronellol and Phenylethyl alcohol by Microwave extraction was 0.0124%±0.003%, 0.0498%±0.002%, respectively. Therefore, ultrasonic and microwave extraction could preserve the unique composition of Ku-shui rose, which could provide evidence for the development of the new product of Ku-shui rose beverage.

     

/

返回文章
返回