• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
李继昊, 黄明远, 王虎虎, 徐幸莲, 周光宏. 热鲜和冷鲜处理对白切鸡食用品质、微观结构以及体外消化率的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(21): 15-21,28. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.004
引用本文: 李继昊, 黄明远, 王虎虎, 徐幸莲, 周光宏. 热鲜和冷鲜处理对白切鸡食用品质、微观结构以及体外消化率的影响[J]. 食品工业科技, 2018, 39(21): 15-21,28. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.004
LI Ji-hao, HUANG Ming-yuan, WANG Hu-hu, XU Xing-lian, ZHOU Guang-hong. Effect of Hot Fresh and Chilling Treatment on Eating Quality, Ultrastructure and in Vitro Digestibility of Soft-boiled Chicken[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(21): 15-21,28. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.004
Citation: LI Ji-hao, HUANG Ming-yuan, WANG Hu-hu, XU Xing-lian, ZHOU Guang-hong. Effect of Hot Fresh and Chilling Treatment on Eating Quality, Ultrastructure and in Vitro Digestibility of Soft-boiled Chicken[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2018, 39(21): 15-21,28. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2018.21.004

热鲜和冷鲜处理对白切鸡食用品质、微观结构以及体外消化率的影响

Effect of Hot Fresh and Chilling Treatment on Eating Quality, Ultrastructure and in Vitro Digestibility of Soft-boiled Chicken

  • 摘要: 本试验旨在研究热鲜鸡(15℃,宰后处理1、2、4 h)和冷鲜鸡(0~4℃,宰后处理24、36、48、60 h)加工的白切鸡在表皮颜色、保水性、剪切力、质构、微观结构、体外消化率及感官评价等方面的差异,探讨能否用冷鲜鸡替代热鲜鸡制作白切鸡。结果表明,热鲜组与冷鲜组在保水性和感官评价方面无显著差异(p>0.05);热鲜1 h组的亮度值显著高于其他各处理组(p<0.05),黄度值各组无显著差异(p>0.05);热鲜组与冷鲜组在硬度、弹性、粘聚性以及回复力方面无显著差异(p>0.05),热鲜4 h、冷鲜24 h和60 h组的咀嚼性显著高于热鲜1 h组(p<0.05);冷鲜组剪切力与肌纤维直径均小于热鲜组,嫩度更佳;冷鲜48、60 h组消化率显著高于热鲜3个处理组(p<0.05),且冷鲜4个处理组消化率均高于热鲜组。综上,冷鲜鸡制作的白切鸡与用热鲜鸡制作的白切鸡在食用品质、微观结构、体外消化率等方面差异不大,甚至更佳,因此,冷鲜鸡能替代热鲜鸡制作白切鸡,同时,本研究也为使用冷鲜鸡制作白切鸡提供了理论依据。

     

    Abstract: The objectives of this study were to analyse the skin color,water holding capacity,shear force,texture profile analysis(TPA),ultrastructure,in vitro digestibility and relative sensory evaluation of soft-boiled chicken prepared by hot fresh(15℃,stored for 1,2,4 h)and chilled chicken(0~4℃,stored for 24,36,48,60 h)and to discuss whether it was feasible to use chilled or frozen chicken to replace hot fresh chicken to make this dish. Results showed that there were no significant differences in water holding capacity and sensory evaluation among hot fresh and chilled treatments(p>0.05). Hot fresh 1 h treatment had significantly higher L* value(p<0.05)than the other treatments while b* value had no significant difference(p>0.05).There also were no significant differences in hardness,springiness,cohesiveness,resilience among all treatments(p>0.05),but chewiness of hot fresh 1 h treatment was significantly lower than hot fresh 4 h,chilled 24 h and 60 h treatments(p<0.05). Chilled treatments had relative lower shear force and shorter fiber diameter than hot fresh treatments so that they had better tenderness. Chilled 48,60 h treatments had significantly higher digestibility than all the three hot fresh treatments(p<0.05)and the digestibility of chilled treatments were relatively higher than hot fresh treatments. The results showed that soft-boiled chicken made from chilled chicken had similar or better qualities than that made from hot fresh chicken. So it was feasible to use chilled chicken to replace hot fresh chicken to make this dish and this paper provided a basis for commercial processing of the soft-boiled chicken.

     

/

返回文章
返回