• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农业核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
党斌. 青海藜麦资源酚类物质及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(17): 30-37. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.17.006
引用本文: 党斌. 青海藜麦资源酚类物质及其抗氧化活性分析[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(17): 30-37. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.17.006
DANG Bin. Analysis on Phenols and Antioxidant Activities of Quinoa Resources in Qinghai[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(17): 30-37. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.17.006
Citation: DANG Bin. Analysis on Phenols and Antioxidant Activities of Quinoa Resources in Qinghai[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(17): 30-37. DOI: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2019.17.006

青海藜麦资源酚类物质及其抗氧化活性分析

Analysis on Phenols and Antioxidant Activities of Quinoa Resources in Qinghai

  • 摘要: 为了明确青海藜麦资源酚类物质含量及其抗氧化活性的差异,筛选出酚类物质和抗氧化活性高的藜麦资源,采用化学法分析了90份藜麦资源中游离酚类、结合酚类含量,通过DPPH·、ABTS+·清除力及FRAP铁还原力指标评价各组分的体外抗氧化活性。结果表明:不同藜麦酚类物质含量均存在较大差异,且结合酚类物质含量差异较大,游离酚类物质含量相对较小,游离酚类和结合酚类物质在清除DPPH·、ABTS+·、FRAP方面存在明显差异,其中结合酚类具有较强的清除DPPH·、ABTS+·能力,分别达4732.56、3371.97 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW;游离酚类的FRAP还原能力相对较强,达1408.64 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW。白色、黄色藜麦的结合酚类物质清除DPPH·、ABTS+·能力显著高于红色藜麦,分别达4657.41、5065.66 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW,3532.37、3350.72 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW;红色藜麦的酚类物质FRAP铁还原力最强(3264.42 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW)。聚类分析表明,参试的大部分青海藜麦资源结合酚类物质含量较低,DPPH·、ABTS+·清除力较弱,但FRAP铁还原力较强,其中有6个藜麦资源的结合酚类物质含量最高,5个藜麦资源的抗氧化活性最强。此结果为功能性藜麦新品种的选育提供了优质资源和指导意义。

     

    Abstract: In order to clarify the difference of phenolic content and antioxidant activity in quinoa resources in Qinghai,the quinoa resources with high phenolic substances and antioxidant activity were screened out. The free phenols and phenols in 90 quinoa resources were analyzed by chemical method. The in vitro antioxidant activity of each component was evaluated by DPPH· and ABTS+· scavenging activity and Ferric ion reducing antioxidant power(FRAP). The results showed that there were significant differences in the content of different phenolic substances in quinoa,and the content of combined phenols had obvious difference,and the content of free phenols was relatively small. There were significant differences in the removal of DPPH·,ABTS+·,and FRAP between free phenols and combined phenols. Among them, combined phenols had strong ability to scavenge DPPH·, ABTS+· free radicals,which were 4732.56,3371.97 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW, respectively. The free phenols had a relatively strong FRAP of 1408.64 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW. The combined phenolic substances of white and yellow quinoa had significantly higher DPPH· and ABTS+· ability than red quinoa,reaching 4657.41,5056.66 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW,3532.37,3355.72 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW. The phenolic substance of red quinoa had the strongest FRAP (3264.42 μmol Trolox Eq/100 g DW). Cluster analysis showed that most of the quinoa resources in Qinghai had lower phenolic content,the scavenging capacity of DPPH· and ABTS+· were weak,but the FRAP was strong. 6 quinoa resources had the highest content of bound phenols and 5 quinoa resources had the strongest antioxidant activity. This result provided high quality resources and guiding significance for the selection of new functional buckwheat varieties.

     

/

返回文章
返回