Effect of Heat Moisture Treatment on Physicochemical and Structural Properties of Yam Flour
-
摘要: 为了研究湿热处理对山药粉理化和结构性质的影响,在90和110 ℃下,分别对水分含量15%、25%和35%的样品进行9 h湿热处理,并对处理后的山药粉进行了溶胀性、糊化特性、热力学特性、结晶程度以及红外光谱的测定。结果表明,湿热处理使山药粉溶解度增加,在处理条件为90 ℃水分含量25%时,溶解度升至9.88%,而膨胀力由3.90 g/g降至3.12 g/g。湿热改性山药粉糊化温度显著升高(P<0.05),但其峰值黏度、谷值黏度、崩解值、最终黏度和回生值较原山药粉都显著降低(P<0.05),糊化焓值呈上升趋势。湿热处理使山药粉结晶度由23.5%升至27.22%,但晶型仍为C型。红外光谱图表明,湿热处理使山药淀粉的短程有序结构轻微改变。湿热处理是一种有效改善山药粉理化性质的方法。Abstract: In order to study the effect of heat moisture treatment on the physicochemical and structural properties of yam flour, the samples with moisture content of 15%, 25% and 35% were subjected to 9 h heat moisture treatment under 90 and 110 ℃ conditions, respectively. The swell ability, gelatinization characteristics, thermodynamic properties, crystallization degree and infrared spectrum of the yam flour after treatment were measured. The results showed that heat moisture treatment increased the solubility of yam flour. When the processing conditions were 90 °C and 25% moisture content, the solubility increased to 9.88%, and the swelling power decreased from 3.90 g/g to 3.12 g/g. The gelatinization temperature of the heat moisture treatment yam flour increased significantly (P<0.05), but its peak viscosity, trough viscosity, breakdown and setback were all significantly (P<0.05) lower than those of the native yam flour, and the gelatinization enthalpy value showed an upward trend. The heat moisture treatment increased the crystallinity of yam flour from 23.5% to 27.22%, while the crystal form was still C-type. Infrared spectra showed that the short-range ordered structure of yam starch was slightly changed by heat moisture treatment. Heat moisture treatment is an effective method to improve the physicochemical properties of yam powder.
-
表 1 湿热处理对山药粉糊化特性的影响
Table 1. Effects of heat moisture treatment on gelatinization characteristics of yam flour
处理条件 峰值黏度(cP) 谷值黏度(cP) 崩解值(cP) 最终黏度(cP) 回生值(cP) 原山药粉 1486.50 ± 125.16a 1254.00 ± 83.44a 232.50 ± 41.72a 1495.00 ± 141.42a 241.00 ± 57.98a 15%−90 ℃ 112.50 ± 0.71b 110.00 ± 1.41b 2.50 ± 0.71b 167.50 ± 3.54b 57.50 ± 2.12b 15%−110 ℃ 43.50 ± 2.12b 41.50 ± 2.12bc 2.50 ± 0.71b 52.50 ± 2.12b 11.00 ± 1.41b 25%−90 ℃ 98.00 ± 4.24b 94.50 ± 3.54bc 3.50 ± 0.71b 139.00 ± 5.66b 44.50 ± 2.12b 25%−110 ℃ 27.00 ± 4.24b 25.00 ± 4.24c 2.00 ± 0.00b 36.00 ± 5.66b 11.00 ± 1.41b 35%−90 ℃ 60.00 ± 0.00b 53.00 ± 0.00bc 7.00 ± 0.00b 93.50 ± 0.71b 40.50 ± 0.71b 35%−110 ℃ 23.00 ± 1.41b 21.50 ± 2.12c 1.50 ± 0.71b 33.00 ± 0.00b 11.50 ± 2.12b 注:同列数据后附不同字母者表示差异显著(P<0.05)。表2同。 表 2 湿热处理对山药粉热力学特性的影响
Table 2. Effects of heat moisture treatment on the thermal characteristics of yam flour
处理条件 To(℃) Tp(℃) Tc(℃) △H(J/g) 原山药粉 77.70 ± 1.70d 85.35 ± 0.07f 87.65 ± 0.07d 1.59 ± 0.05b 15%−90 ℃ 81.00 ± 1.27c 86.90 ± 0.57e 90.15 ± 1.48c 1.65 ± 0.21b 15%−110 ℃ 85.65 ± 1.06b 88.70 ± 0.14d 93.50 ± 0.57b 1.80 ± 0.16a 25%−90 ℃ 83.20 ± 0.42c 87.45 ± 0.35e 91.65 ± 0.35c 1.78 ± 0.04a 25%−110 ℃ 87.70 ± 0.85b 93.45 ± 0.07b 97.90 ± 0.28a 1.61 ± 0.19b 35%−90 ℃ 86.80 ± 0.14b 90.05 ± 0.07c 93.65 ± 0.07b 1.67 ± 0.08b 35%−110 ℃ 90.40 ± 0.28a 95.40 ± 0.00a 99.25 ± 0.00a 1.58 ± 0.09b -
[1] 黄玉仙. 山药(Rhizoma Dioscorea)种质资源研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2012. [2] 张娟. 山药营养保健挂面的研制[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2008: 11−12. [3] 刘霞. 紫山药粉对小麦面包体外淀粉酶消化性的影响[C]. 中国食品科学技术学会 (Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology). 中国食品科学技术学会第十五届年会论文摘要集. 中国食品科学技术学会(Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology): 中国食品科学技术学会, 2018: 806−807. [4] 鲁玉凤, 屈慧如, 罗博文, 等. 山药-小麦粉质构特性及挂面品质研究[J]. 农产品加工,2019(17):24−26, 29. [5] Vu T H, Bean S, Hsieh C F, et al. Changes in protein and starch digestibility in Sorghum flour during heat-moisture treatments[J]. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture,2017,97(14):4770−4779. doi: 10.1002/jsfa.8346 [6] Zhang F, Zhang Y Y, Thakur K, et al. Structural and physicochemical characteristics of Lycoris starch treated with different physical methods[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,275:8−14. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.079 [7] Molavi H, Razavi S M A, Farhoosh R. Impact of hydrothermal modifications on the physicochemical, morphology, crystallinity, pasting and thermal properties of acorn starch[J]. Food Chemistry,2018,245:385−393. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.10.117 [8] 刘琳. 球磨和湿热处理对淀粉结构和理化性质的影响[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2015. [9] Xiao Y, Liu H, Wei T, et al. Differences in physicochemical properties and in vitro digestibility between tartary buckwheat flour and starch modified by heat-moisture treatment[J]. LWT,2017,86:285−292. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2017.08.001 [10] Dwi Rukmi Putri W, Zubaidah E, Widya Ningtyas D. Effect of heat moisture treatment on functional properties and microstuctural profiles of sweet potato flour[J]. Advance Journal of Food Science and Technology,2014,6(5):655−659. doi: 10.19026/ajfst.6.90 [11] 林志荣, 高群玉. 淀粉的湿热处理及其发展前景[J]. 粮食与饲料工业,2005(8):22−23. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-6202.2005.08.010 [12] 李明菲. 不同热处理方式对小麦粉特性影响研究[D]. 郑州: 河南工业大学, 2016. [13] 闫巧珍, 高瑞雄, 张正茂, 等. 湿热处理对马铃薯全粉品质的影响[J]. 现代食品科技,2017,33(4):264−270, 294. [14] 金金. 山药制粉加工技术研究[D]. 无锡: 江南大学, 2011. [15] Cahyana Y, Wijaya E, Halimah T S, et al. The effect of different thermal modifications on slowly digestible starch and physicochemical properties of green banana flour (Musa acuminata Colla)[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,274:274−280. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.09.004 [16] Ahn J H, Baek H R, Kim K M, et al. Slowly digestible sweetpotato flour: Preparation by heat-moisture treatment and characterization of physicochemical properties[J]. Food Science and Biotechnology,2013,22(2):383−391. doi: 10.1007/s10068-013-0091-z [17] 张丽芳, 宋洪波, 安凤平, 等. 淮山药淀粉及其抗性淀粉理化性质的比较[J]. 中国粮油学报,2014,29(3):24−29. [18] Silva W M F, Biduski B, Lima K O, et al. Starch digestibility and molecular weight distribution of proteins in rice grains subjected to heat-moisture treatment[J]. Food Chemistry,2017,219:260−267. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2016.09.134 [19] 李涛, 安凤平, 宋洪波, 等. 热处理对紫山药淀粉理化和消化特性的影响[J]. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2018,47(2):250−256. [20] 闫巧珍. 马铃薯全粉理化性质和消化特性的研究[D]. 杨凌: 西北农林科技大学, 2017. [21] Puncha-Arnon S, Uttapap D. Rice starch vs. rice flour: Differences in their properties when modified by heat-moisture treatment[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2013,91(1):85−91. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.08.006 [22] Chen X, He X W, Fu X, et al. In vitro digestion and physicochemical properties of wheat starch/flour modified by heat-moisture treatment[J]. Journal of Cereal Science,2015,63:109−115. doi: 10.1016/j.jcs.2015.03.003 [23] Lu Z H, Donner E, Yada R Y, et al. Physicochemical properties and in vitro starch digestibility of potato starch/protein blends[J]. Carbohydrate Polymers,2016,154:214−222. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.08.055 [24] 陈佩, 张晓, 赵冰, 等. 湿热处理对糯小麦淀粉理化性质的影响[J]. 华南农业大学学报,2015,36(2):85−89. doi: 10.7671/j.issn.1001-411X.2015.02.015 [25] 刘星, 范楷, 司文帅, 等. 谷粒湿热处理对薏仁米淀粉形态、结构与热特性的影响[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(19):128−133. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201819020 [26] 姚映西, 吴卫国. 湿热改性处理对大米粉性质影响[J]. 粮食与油脂,2016,29(2):60−64. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-9578.2016.02.015 [27] Yang C H, Zhong F, Douglas Goff H, et al. Study on starch-protein interactions and their effects on physicochemical and digestible properties of the blends[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,280:51−58. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2018.12.028 [28] 李照茜. 湿热处理对板栗淀粉结构及理化性质的影响[D]. 北京: 北京工业大学, 2016. -