不同护色处理和干燥方式对芦笋粉品质的影响

赵时珊; 施建斌; 隋勇; 蔡沙; 熊添; 李少斌; 蔡芳; 梅新

doi:10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022060091

不同护色处理和干燥方式对芦笋粉品质的影响

doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2022060091

赵时珊^{1, 2,},
施建斌¹,
隋勇¹,
蔡沙¹,
熊添¹,
李少斌²,
蔡芳¹,
梅新^1, ,

1.
湖北省农科院农产品加工与核农技术研究所，湖北武汉 430064
2.
长江大学生命科学学院，湖北荆州 434025

基金项目: 湖北省农业科技成果转化资金项目（2021ABC019）。

详细信息

作者简介:
赵时珊（1997−），女，硕士研究生，研究方向：食品加工与安全，E-mail：1045298995@qq.com

通讯作者:
梅新（1978−），男，博士，研究员，研究方向：农产品深加工及利用，E-mail：112076404@qq.com

中图分类号: TS255.1
计量
- 文章访问数: 90
- HTML全文浏览量: 24
- PDF下载量: 10
- 被引次数: 0
出版历程
- 收稿日期: 2022-06-10
- 网络出版日期: 2023-04-20
- 刊出日期: 2023-06-01

Effects of Different Color Protection and Drying Methods Treatment on the Quality of Asparagus Powder

ZHAO Shishan^{1, 2
,},
SHI Jianbin¹,
SUI Yong¹,
CAI Sha¹,
XIONG Tian¹,
LI Shaobin²,
CAI Fang¹,
MEI Xin^{1
, ,}

1.
Institute of Agricultural Products Processing and Nuclear Agricultural Technology, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan 430064, China
2.
School of Life Sciences, Yangtze University, Jingzhou 434025, China

摘要

摘要: 为改善并对比芦笋在热风、真空冷冻和微波干燥过程中出现的褐变问题，故采用不同的护色剂对芦笋进行浸泡、喷涂护色处理。结果显示，相较于不护色，经护色的芦笋粉营养及色泽品质更佳。其中护3的护色效果显著（P<0.05）优于护2和护1。干燥方式和护色剂的协同使用优于单独干燥。其中，护色剂-真空冷冻干燥（VFD）协同处理的芦笋粉的酚类物质保留程度、结构完整性、色泽及抗氧化能力最佳；护色剂-热风干燥（HAD）协同处理的芦笋粉组织结构稀疏分散，酚类含量、色泽、抗氧化能力不及VFD；而护色剂-微波干燥（MD）所得芦笋粉色泽焦黄，营养及色泽品质最差。此外，相较于浸泡，经喷涂的芦笋粉水可溶性膳食纤维（SDF）含量更高，葡萄糖、胆固醇吸附能力也更好，但前者的护色效果更佳。主成分分析结果表明，芦笋粉的总酚和芦丁含量，以及理化和功能性质指标与其营养及色泽品质具有高度相关性。综合品质排名前三的芦笋粉为护3-浸泡-VFD、护2-浸泡-VFD和护3-喷涂-VFD；后三为护1-喷涂-MD、护2-喷涂-MD、对照-MD。本研究结果为提高芦笋干燥产品品质提供理论依据。
- 芦笋粉 /
- 护色方式 /
- 干燥方式 /
- 多酚类物质 /
- 理化性质 /
- 功能特性 /
- 色泽品质
Abstract: Different color protection agents were used to soak and spray the asparagus for color protection due to improve and compare the browning problem of asparagus during the process of hot air, vacuum freezing and microwave drying. The results showed that the quality of nutrition and color of asparagus powder with color protection was better than that without color protection. The color protection effect of Hu3 was significantly better than that of Hu2 and Hu1 (P<0.05). The synergistic use of drying method and color fixative was better than that of single drying. Among them, the retention degree of phenols, structural integrity, color and antioxidant capacity of asparagus powder treated by color fixative and vacuum freeze drying (VFD) were the best. The structure of asparagus powder treated by color fixative and hot air drying (HAD) was sparse and dispersed, and the content of phenols, color and antioxidant capacity were lower than VFD. However, the asparagus powder obtained by color fixative and microwave drying (MD), was bright yellow, with the worst nutrition and color quality. In addition, compared with soaking, the water soluble dietary fiber (SDF) content of sprayed asparagus powder was higher, and the adsorption capacity of glucose and cholesterol was better, but the color protection effect of the former was better. The results of principal component analysis showed that the total phenol, rutin, physicochemical and functional properties of asparagus powder were highly correlated with its nutrition and color quality. The top three asparagus powder in terms of comprehensive quality were Hu3-Soak-VFD, Hu2-Soak-VFD and Hu3-Spray-VFD. The last three were Hu1-Spray-MD, Hu2-Spray-MD and control-MD. The results of this study provide a theoretical basis for improving the quality of dried asparagus products.
- asparagus powder /
- color protection method /
- drying method /
- polyphenols /
- physical and chemical properties /
- functional characteristics /
- color quality

HTML全文

图 1 芦笋粉微观结构

Figure 1. Microstructure of asparagus powder

注：图A~图F分别表示对照-MD，护3-浸泡-MD，对照-VFD，护3-浸泡-VFD，对照-HAD，护3-浸泡-HAD。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 芦笋粉葡萄糖吸附能力

Figure 2. Glucose adsorption capacity of asparagus powder

注：小写字母不同表示同一干燥方式，不同护色方法处理的组间差异显著（P<0.05），图3~图7同。

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 3 芦笋粉胆固醇吸附能力

Figure 3. Cholesterol adsorption capacity of asparagus powder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 4 芦笋粉DPPH自由基清除能力

Figure 4. DPPH free radical scavenging capacity of asparagus powder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 5 芦笋粉超氧阴离子自由基清除率

Figure 5. Superoxide anion radical scavenging rate of asparagus powder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 6 芦笋粉羟基自由基清除能力

Figure 6. Hydroxyl radical scavenging capacity of asparagus powder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 7 芦笋粉总还原能力

Figure 7. Total reduction capacity of asparagus powder

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

表 1 芦笋粉组成成分分析

Table 1. Composition analysis of asparagus powder

组别		总酚（mg GAE/g DW）	总黄酮（mg RE/g DW）	芦丁（mg RE/100 g DW）	IDF（g/100 g）	SDF（g/100 g）
MD	对照	4.06±0.00^d	2.98±0.03^d	56.32±2.70^e	59.11±0.54^b	15.26±0.18^c
	护1-浸泡	4.98±0.00^cd	3.83±0.22^bc	83.56±0.63^b	59.29±0.90^b	14.31±0.11^f
	护1-喷涂	4.53±0.08^bc	3.29±0.12^cd	59.33±1.25^de	60.36±9.68^a	14.56±0.62^e
	护2-浸泡	5.46±0.05^b	4.70±0.12^a	105.18±0.19^a	64.08±0.87^a	14.75±0.18^d
	护2-喷涂	5.00±0.19^bc	3.88±0.28^bc	80.67±2.97^bc	64.45±0.87^a	15.75±0.27^b
	护3-浸泡	6.51±0.07^a	4.26±0.22^bc	88.95±7.37^b	64.43±1.14^a	14.55±0.15^e
	护3-喷涂	5.10±0.01^b	3.78±0.07^bc	70.79±4.06^cd	65.31±0.34^a	16.37±1.12^a
VFD	对照	6.37±0.05^d	3.64±0.08^d	95.73±0.07^d	63.85±0.10^c	14.98±0.50^f
	护1-浸泡	6.95±0.17^c	3.75±0.10^cd	111.62±3.78^c	60.06±0.65^e	15.99±0.22^e
	护1-喷涂	6.86±0.28^c	3.45±0.27^d	102.14±2.73^d	61.04±0.74^de	16.56±1.24^c
	护2-浸泡	8.52±0.10^b	4.61±0.23^ab	125.62±0.54^b	65.80±0.71^a	17.13±0.57^b
	护2-喷涂	8.25±0.12^b	3.69±0.04^cd	114.81±1.82^c	64.41±0.13^b	17.52±0.12^a
	护3-浸泡	9.46±0.03^a	4.87±0.07^a	142.84±0.67^a	61.21±1.37^d	16.03±0.26^d
	护3-喷涂	8.45±0.02^b	4.18±0.06^bc	130.32±0.08^b	63.38±1.04^c	16.58±0.74^c
HAD	对照	5.63±0.03^d	3.05±0.05^c	73.95±0.23^d	64.65±3.18^a	15.01±0.02^a
	护1-浸泡	5.85±0.06^c	3.28±0.19^abc	82.52±3.93^d	62.73±0.78^a	14.18±1.23^a
	护1-喷涂	5.76±0.04^c	3.21±0.05^bc	59.09±6.76^e	61.13±0.12^a	15.87±0.02^a
	护2-浸泡	6.20±0.03^b	3.60±0.00^a	110.37±0.82^b	64.86±0.41^a	14.18±0.60^a
	护2-喷涂	5.88±0.03^c	3.31±0.15^abc	98.08±1.34^c	63.18±0.31^a	15.39±0.86^a
	护3-浸泡	7.11±0.02^a	3.47±0.06^ab	129.69±1.01^a	64.45±0.31^a	14.71±0.61^a
	护3-喷涂	6.20±0.00^b	3.41±0.03^abc	124.42±2.54^a	64.69±0.78^a	15.56±0.71^a
注: 同一干燥方式下不同护色处理组内字母不同表示差异性显著（P<0.05），表2~表3同。

下载: 导出CSV

表 2 芦笋粉基本理化性质分析

Table 2. Analysis of basic physical and chemical properties of asparagus powder

组别		持水性（g/g）	持油性（g/g）	吸水膨胀性（mL/g）	组别		持水性（g/g）	持油性（g/g）	吸水膨胀性（mL/g）
MD	对照	3.46±0.10^e	1.59±0.05^a	2.71±0.05^cd	VFD	护2-喷涂	7.93±0.28^a	2.21±0.17^a	7.05±0.46^bc
	护1-浸泡	3.81±0.05^d	1.31±0.24^bc	2.43±0.33^d		护3-浸泡	6.90±0.18^d	2.23±0.01^a	8.55±0.40^a
	护1-喷涂	3.65±0.01^d	1.03±0.01^c	3.17±0.09^bcd		护3-喷涂	7.14±0.02^cd	2.08±0.06^ab	7.94±0.29^ab
	护2-浸泡	4.38±0.02^c	1.22±0.05^c	3.37±0.25^ab	HAD	对照	4.05±0.03^cd	2.41±0.03^ab	4.55±0.01^b
	护2-喷涂	4.73±0.02^b	1.12±0.09^c	3.89±0.18^a		护1-浸泡	4.26±0.04^c	2.26±0.05^b	4.19±0.02^c
	护3-浸泡	4.24±0.06^c	1.33±0.03^bc	2.54±0.07^cd		护1-喷涂	3.94±0.04^d	2.50±0.09^a	3.31±0.10^d
	护3-喷涂	5.49±0.06^a	1.29±0.00^bc	3.61±0.00^ab		护2-浸泡	3.87±0.07^d	2.27±0.00^b	3.49±0.04^d
VFD	对照	4.07±0.01^e	2.08±0.48^ab	4.06±0.04^d		护2-喷涂	5.03±0.06^a	2.00±0.04^c	6.36±0.01^a
	护1-浸泡	7.45±0.09^bc	1.85±0.01^bc	7.09±0.05^b		护3-浸泡	3.87±0.04^d	2.27±0.01^b	4.12±0.10^c
	护1-喷涂	6.89±0.03^d	1.77±0.03^c	5.94±0.50^c		护3-喷涂	4.53±0.12^b	2.03±0.12^c	4.03±0.08^c
	护2-浸泡	7.90±0.07^ab	2.34±0.13^a	7.92±0.14^ab

下载: 导出CSV

表 3 芦笋粉色度值

Table 3. Chroma value of asparagus powder

组别		L^*	a^*	b^*	组别		L^*	a^*	b^*
MD	对照	66.68±1.03^d	−2.18±0.06^e	16.33±0.14^c	VFD	护2-喷涂	81.00±0.75^ab	−6.19±0.03^bc	22.68±0.51^a
	护1-浸泡	71.77±1.15^a	−2.38±0.05^f	19.58±0.52^ab		护3-浸泡	80.33±0.97^b	−6.47±0.14^c	22.99±0.36^a
	护1-喷涂	69.14±0.50^bc	−1.85±0.06^d	19.10±0.24^b		护3-喷涂	81.67±0.07^ab	−6.38±0.01^c	22.96±0.28^a
	护2-浸泡	70.67±0.67^ab	−1.12±0.09^c	20.05±0.10^a	HAD	对照	87.42±0.10^a	−3.10±0.04^a	18.18±0.04^d
	护2-喷涂	70.33±1.02^abc	−0.69±0.05^a	19.11±0.69^b		护1-浸泡	83.43±0.30^d	−3.56±0.05^b	18.20±0.10^d
	护3-浸泡	71.27±0.21^a	−2.42±0.10^f	20.83±0.28^a		护1-喷涂	84.47±0.14^c	−3.53±0.04^b	19.37±0.17^b
	护3-喷涂	68.42±0.90^cd	−0.89±0.08^b	19.58±0.28^ab		护2-浸泡	83.30±0.10^e	−3.72±0.06^d	20.38±0.07^a
VFD	对照	81.17±0.29^ab	−5.92±0.13^a	21.92±0.59^a		护2-喷涂	85.41±0.47^b	−3.53±0.03^b	18.20±0.23^d
	护1-浸泡	81.39±0.22^ab	−6.35±0.03^bc	22.88±0.41^a		护3-浸泡	82.38±0.23^f	−3.93±0.02^e	20.40±0.06^a
	护1-喷涂	81.77±0.31^a	−6.33±0.05^b	22.26±0.68^a		护3-喷涂	84.50±0.22^c	−3.61±0.04^c	18.85±0.09^c
	护2-浸泡	80.44±0.32^ab	−6.23±0.08^bc	22.71±0.02^a

下载: 导出CSV

表 4 不同护色处理和干燥方式芦笋粉品质主成分方差贡献率

Table 4. Variance contribution rate of main components of asparagus powder quality under different color protection treatments and drying methods

成分	解释的总方差
成分	总计	方差百分比（%）	累积（%）
PC1	8.95	52.67	52.67
PC2	2.87	16.88	69.55
PC3	1.59	9.33	78.88

下载: 导出CSV

表 5 不同护色处理和干燥方式芦笋粉品质主成分载荷矩阵数值

Table 5. Value of the principal component load matrix of asparagus powder under different color protection treatments and drying methods

成分	PC1	PC2	PC3
总酚	0.92	0.05	−0.07
总黄酮	0.45	0.59	0.36
芦丁	0.78	−0.09	0.28
IDF	0.32	−0.41	0.70
SDF	0.65	−0.10	0.59
持水性	0.85	0.27	0.09
持油性	0.55	−0.71	−0.29
吸水膨胀性	0.90	0.07	−0.11
葡萄糖吸附能力	0.51	−0.64	0.29
胆固醇吸附能力	0.53	0.65	−0.16
DPPH自由基清除能力	0.94	0.09	−0.15
超氧离子自由基清除能力	0.82	0.26	−0.23
羟基自由基清除能力	0.89	0.13	−0.21
总还原力	0.93	0.12	−0.06
L^*	0.61	−0.70	−0.15
a^*	−0.84	0.28	0.30
b^*	0.35	0.49	0.29

下载: 导出CSV

表 6 不同护色处理和干燥方式芦笋粉品质主成分综合得分

Table 6. Comprehensive score of quality principal components of asparagus powder under different color protection treatments and drying methods

组别		Z1	Z2	Z3	Z综	排名	组别		Z1	Z2	Z3	Z综	排名
MD	对照	−6.04	0.93	−2.22	−3.23	21	VFD	护2-喷涂	4.29	0.40	1.13	2.38	4
	护1-浸泡	−2.54	2.33	−1.09	−1.04	16		护3-浸泡	4.91	1.63	−1.97	2.68	1
	护1-喷涂	−3.40	1.53	−0.55	−1.58	19		护3-喷涂	4.09	1.95	−1.03	2.39	3
	护2-浸泡	−2.67	0.55	2.17	−1.11	18	HAD	对照	−1.36	−1.78	−0.40	−1.05	17
	护2-喷涂	−2.19	−3.39	−1.62	−1.88	20		护1-浸泡	−0.46	−1.88	−0.04	−0.57	12
	护3-浸泡	−2.00	1.85	0.80	−0.67	14		护1-喷涂	−1.92	2.11	1.51	−0.52	11
	护3-喷涂	−2.10	0.97	2.44	−0.71	15		护2-浸泡	0.54	−2.04	0.92	0.03	8
VFD	对照	0.55	−0.89	−0.18	0.12	7		护2-喷涂	0.23	−1.82	0.50	−0.14	10
	护1-浸泡	3.14	0.92	−0.85	1.73	5		护3-浸泡	0.50	−1.86	0.18	−0.03	9
	护1-喷涂	2.62	0.33	−0.50	1.39	6		护3-喷涂	−0.71	−1.27	−0.12	−0.60	13
	护2-浸泡	4.53	−0.56	1.07	2.43	2

下载: 导出CSV

参考文献(34)

[1]	魏云潇, 王楠, 余作龙, 等. 采后芦笋多酚类物质变化的研究进展[J]. 保鲜与加工,2022,22(1):102−109. [WEI Yunxiao, WANG Nan, YU Zuolong, et al. Research progress on changes of polyphenols in postharvest asparagus[J]. Storage and Process,2022,22(1):102−109. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-6221.2022.01.014
[2]	MEKA K W, DUKASSA D A, TOFIK A E. Nephroprotective effect of Asparagus africanus Lam. root extract against gentamicin-induced nephrotoxicity in swiss albino mice[J]. Journal of Toxicology,2022,22(19):2−5.
[3]	BHALODIYA M, CHAVDA J, PATEL N. Evaluation of solvent extraction process for Asparagus racemosus root extract through the determination of its phenolic content and antioxidant activity assay[J]. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology,2021,14(10):5108−5114.
[4]	周驰. 芦笋粉加工关键技术及应用研究[D]. 泰安: 山东农业大学, 2015. ZHOU Chi. Research on key technology and application of asparagus powder processing [D]. Taian: Shandong Agricultural University, 2015.
[5]	杨强. 芦笋中多酚氧化酶(PPO)酶学特性研究[J]. 科技创新与应用,2013(23):1−7. [YANG Qiang. Study on enzymatic characteristics of polyphenol oxidase (PPO) in asparagus[J]. Technology Innovation and Application,2013(23):1−7.
[6]	赵洪军, 朱丹, 王珂, 等. 芦笋提取液体外抗氧化、细胞毒作用及抑制α-葡萄糖苷酶活性研究[J]. 天然产物研究与开发,2011,23(2):356−360. [ZHAO Hongjun, ZHU Dan, WANG Ke, et al. Antioxidant, cytotoxic and inhibitory effects of asparagus extract in vitro α-study on glucosidase activity[J]. Natural Product Research and Development,2011,23(2):356−360. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-6880.2011.02.037
[7]	付三乔. 芦笋无硫护色工艺的研究[J]. 湖北农业科学,2011,50(6):1247−1249. [FU Sanqiao. Study on sulfur free color protection technology of asparagus[J]. Hubei Agricultural Sciences,2011,50(6):1247−1249. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2011.06.049
[8]	朱蕴兰, 陈宏伟, 陈安徽, 等. 不同干燥方式对芦笋营养与品质特性的影响[J]. 北方园艺,2018(1):129−134. [ZHU Yunlan, CHEN Hongwei, CHEN Anhui, et al. Effects of different drying methods on nutrition and quality characteristics of asparagus[J]. Northern Horticulture,2018(1):129−134. doi: 10.11937/bfyy.20171059
[9]	杜俊娜, 陈书霞, 程智慧, 等. 响应曲面法优化大蒜中总酚提取工艺及其抗氧化活性的测定[J]. 食品科学,2012,33(10):6−9. [DU Junna, CHEN Shuxia, CHENG Zhihui, et al. Optimization of extraction process of total phenols from garlic and determination of antioxidant activity by response surface methodology[J]. Food Science,2012,33(10):6−9.
[10]	杨永涛. 罗布麻总黄酮的提取、分离纯化及其抗氧化性能研究[D]. 广州: 华南理工大学, 2018. YANG Yongtao. Study on extraction, purification and antioxidant properties of total flavonoids from Apocynum venetum[D]. Guangzhou: South China University of Technology, 2018.
[11]	殷丛培, 吴盟, 王志博, 等. 高粱籽粒中9种黄酮类化合物的积累特性分析[J]. 中国粮油学报,2022,37(12):76−83. [YIN Congpei, WU Meng, WANG Zhibo, et al. Accumulation characteristics of 9 flavonoids in sorghum grains[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association,2022,37(12):76−83. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-0174.2022.12.012
[12]	陈洁, 张智勇, 李璞, 等. 马铃薯生全粉-小麦粉混粉面团特性研究[J]. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版),2021,42(01):1−7. [CHEN Jie, ZHANG Zhiyong, LI Pu, et al. Study on characteristics of potato raw whole flour wheat flour mixed dough[J]. Journal of Henan University of Technology(Natural Science Edition),2021,42(01):1−7.
[13]	蔡沙, 隋勇, 施建斌, 等. 马铃薯膳食纤维物化特性分析及其对马铃薯热干面品质的影响[J]. 食品科学,2019,40(4):87−94. [CAI Sha, SUI Yong, SHI Jianbin, et al. Analysis of physicochemical characteristics of potato dietary fiber and its effect on the quality of potato hot and dry noodles[J]. Food Science,2019,40(4):87−94. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-20171213-151
[14]	张毅, TAWANDA Muzhingi, 岳瑞雪, 等. 东非不同肉色甘薯的营养品质分析与综合评价[J]. 江苏师范大学学报:自然科学版,2020,38(2):6−7. [ZHANG Yi, TAWANDA Muzhingi, QIU Ruixue, et al. Nutritional quality analysis and comprehensive evaluation of sweet potatoes with different meat colors in East Africa[J]. Journal of Jiangsu Normal University:Natural Science Edition,2020,38(2):6−7.
[15]	陈蓬凤, 梅新, 黄师荣, 等. 不同品种薯尖的总酚、总黄酮含量及抗氧化活性比较[J]. 现代食品科技,2021,37(3):132−138. [CHEN Pengfeng, MEI Xin, HUANG Shirong, et al. Comparison of total phenols, total flavonoids and antioxidant activity of potato tips of different varieties[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology,2021,37(3):132−138.
[16]	TI Huihui, LI Qing, ZHANG Ruifen, et al. Free and bound phenolic profiles and antioxidant activity of milled fractions of different indica rice varieties cultivated in Southern China[J]. Food Chemistry,2014,159:166−174. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.03.029
[17]	ZHANG Liuquan, LI Yi, LIANG Ying, et al. Determination of phenolic acid profiles by HPLC-MS in vegetables commonly consumed in China[J]. Food Chemistry,2018,276(13):12−17.
[18]	付龙威, 连建梅, 叶淑贤, 等. 不同干燥工艺对燕窝品质特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2022,5(13):1−12. [FU Longwei, LIAN Jianmei, YE Shuxian, et al. Effects of different drying processes on the quality characteristics of bird's nest[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2022,5(13):1−12. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2021110300
[19]	王润丰. 四种百合黄酮类化合物分离纯化与抗氧化作用的研究[D]. 咸阳: 西北农林科技大学, 2011. WANG Runfeng. Isolation and purification of four flavonoids from lily[D]. Xianyang: Northwest University of Agriculture and Forestry Science and Technology, 2011.
[20]	姚红娟. 芦笋茎秆中膳食纤维素及微晶纤维素提取工艺的研究[D]. 济南: 齐鲁工业大学, 2017. YAO Hongjuan. Study on extraction technology of dietary cellulose and microcrystalline cellulose from asparagus stems[D]. Jinan: Qilu University of Technology, 2017.
[21]	PETITOT M, ABECASSIS J, MICARD V. Structuring of pasta components during processing: Impact on starch and protein digestibility and allergenicity[J]. Trends in Food Science & Technology,2009,20(11-12):521−532.
[22]	扶庆权, 王海鸥, 陈雨, 等. 不同干燥方式对白玉菇品质的影响[J]. 食品研究与开发,2019,40(17):5−8. [FU Qingquan, WANG Haiou, CHEN Yu, et al. Effect of different drying methods on the quality of white jade mushroom[J]. Food Research and Development,2019,40(17):5−8. doi: 10.12161/j.issn.1005-6521.2019.17.026
[23]	YAN Weiqiang, ZHANG Ming, HUANG Luelue, et al. Influence of microwave drying method on the characteristics of the sweet potato dices[J]. Journal of Food Processing & Preservation,2013,37(5):662−669.
[24]	WANG Liling, QIN Yuchuan, WANG Yanbin, et al. A pair of homoisoflavonoid analogues (6-aldehydo-isoophiopogonanone A/6-aldehydo-isoophiopogonanone B) from Ophiopogon japonicus as a tyrosinase inhibitor: Inhibitory activity, conformational change and mechanism[J]. European Food Research and Technology,2021(prepublish):123−126.
[25]	黄建立, 黄艳, 郑宝东, 等. 不同干燥方式对银耳品质的影响[J]. 中国食品学报,2010,10(2):167−173. [HUANG Jianli, HUANG Yan, ZHENG Baodong, et al. Effects of different drying methods on the quality of Tremella[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2010,10(2):167−173. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-7848.2010.02.025
[26]	刘静娜, 黄志娜, 吴丽萍. 芦笋膳食纤维的提取及其在面包中的应用[J]. 食品科技,2010,35(11):178−185. [LIU Jingna, HUANG Zhina, WU Liping. Extraction of asparagus dietary fiber and its application in bread[J]. Food Science and Technology,2010,35(11):178−185. doi: 10.13684/j.cnki.spkj.2010.11.035
[27]	黄萍, 林亲录, 朱凤霞, 等. 米糠水溶性膳食纤维理化特性及抗氧化性[J]. 食品科学,2017,38(23):14−19. [HUANG Ping, LIN Qinlu, ZHU Fengxia, et al. Physicochemical properties and antioxidant properties of rice bran water-soluble dietary fiber[J]. Food Science,2017,38(23):14−19. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201723003
[28]	王艳丽, 刘凌, 孙慧, 等. 膳食纤维的微观结构及功能特性研究[J]. 中国食品添加剂,2014(2):98−103. [WANG Yanli, LIU Ling, SUN Hui, et al. Study on microstructure and functional properties of dietary fiber[J]. China Food Additives,2014(2):98−103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-2513.2014.02.011
[29]	桂青, 王秀全, 黄坚雄, 等. 不同干燥方式对五指毛桃品质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2019(4):1−14. [GUI Qing, WANG Xiuquan, HUANG Jianxiong, et al. Effects of different drying methods on the quality of five fingered peach[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019(4):1−14.
[30]	刘颖. 大气液相中典型酚类污染物与超氧阴离子自由基的光化学反应[D]. 合肥: 合肥工业大学, 2021. LIU Ying. Photochemical reaction of typical phenolic pollutants with superoxide anion radical in atmospheric liquid phase[D]. Hefei: Hefei University of Technology, 2021.
[31]	贾毅伟, 张家荣, 陈果, 等. 芦笋老茎中总黄酮的提取及其抗氧化性能[J]. 南昌大学学报(工科版),2020,42(2):144−193. [JIA Yiwei, ZHANG Jiarong, CHEN Guo, et al. Extraction and antioxidant activity of total flavonoids from old asparagus stems[J]. Journal of Nanchang University(Engineering & Technology),2020,42(2):144−193.
[32]	王盛林, 赵震宇, 刘平怀, 等. 胶网藻1A10营养成分及羟基自由基清除能力研究[J]. 上海海洋大学学报,2018,27(2):196−205. [WANG Shenglin, ZHAO Zhenyu, LIU Pinghuai, et al. Study on nutritional components and hydroxyl radical scavenging ability of jiaoreticulina 1A10[J]. Journal of Shanghai Ocean University,2018,27(2):196−205.
[33]	龙晓珊, 廖森泰, 刘书成, 等. 肉桂多酚清除自由基及抑制α-葡萄糖苷酶活性的能力[J]. 现代食品科技,2021,37(8):119−126. [LONG Xiaoshan, LIAO Sentai, LIU Shucheng, et al. Free radical scavenging and inhibition of cinnamon polyphenols α-ability of glucosidase activity[J]. Modern Food Science and Technology,2021,37(8):119−126.
[34]	杨晓宽, 李汉臣, 张建才, 等. 芦笋膳食纤维品质分析及抗氧化性研究[J]. 中国食品学报,2013,13(10):205−212. [YANG Xiaokuan, Li Hanchen, ZHANG Jiancai, et al. Quality analysis and antioxidant activity of asparagus dietary fiber[J]. Journal of Chinese Institute of Food Science and Technology,2013,13(10):205−212. doi: 10.16429/j.1009-7848.2013.10.009