Effects of Storage Temperature on the Postharvest Quality and Volatile Flavor Components of Stropharia rugoso-annulata
-
摘要: 为研究贮藏温度对大球盖菇保鲜效果的影响，以新鲜大球盖菇为试材，于不同贮藏温度（0、15 ℃）下贮藏12 d，定期取样进行大球盖菇开伞率、腐烂率、失重率、色泽、硬度、咀嚼性及挥发性风味物质的测定。结果表明：15 ℃下新鲜大球盖菇贮藏期为4~6 d，0 ℃下贮藏12 d后品质良好。与15 ℃相比，0 ℃贮藏能显著降低大球盖菇的开伞率、腐烂率和失重率，更好地维持大球盖菇的硬度、咀嚼性和色泽。0 ℃贮藏12 d后大球盖菇腐烂率为12.12%，显著低于15 ℃贮藏组（95.45%，P<0.05）。3-辛醇、1-辛烯-3-醇、反-2-辛烯醛、壬醛、癸醛、3-辛酮、2-戊基呋喃是新鲜大球盖菇的特征风味物质，且3-辛醇和己醛是大球盖菇采后品质劣变的关键挥发性风味成分。与15 ℃贮藏组相比，0 ℃贮藏组大球盖菇电子鼻响应值更低，正己醇、己醛、壬醛等不良风味成分的相对气味活度值更低，并且挥发性风味物质种类更多。因此，0 ℃贮藏能有效保持大球盖菇的采后品质，抑制其风味劣变。Abstract: To verify the effect of storage temperature on the preservation of Stropharia rugoso-annula, fresh Stropharia rugoso-annulata was stored at different temperatures (0, 15 ℃) for 12 days, and the cap opening rate, decay rate, weight loss rate, color, hardness, chewiness and volatile flavor compounds were determinated at regular time. The results showed that fresh Stropharia rugoso-annulata could be stored at 15 ℃ for about 4~6 days while exhibited good quality after storage for 12 days at 0 ℃. Compared with 15 ℃, Stropharia rugoso-annulata storage at 0 ℃ had lower cap opening rate, decay rate and weight loss rate, and higher hardness, chewiness and color. After 12 days of storage at 0 ℃, the decay rate of Stropharia rugoso-annulata was 12.12%, which was significantly lower than that of 15 ℃ group (95.45%, P<0.05). 3-Octanol, 1-octene-3-ol, (E)-2-octenal, nonanal, decanal, 3-octanone, 2-pentylfuran were the characteristic flavor substances in fresh Stropharia rugoso-annulata. In addition, the 3-octanol and hexanal were the key substances for the flavor deterioration of Stropharia rugoso-annulata. The electronic nose response values in the 0 ℃ group were lower than those in the 15 ℃ group. The relative odor activity values of hexanol, hexanal, nonanal and other bad flavor components in the 0 ℃ group were lower. Moreover, the 0 ℃ group contained more types of volatile flavor compounds. Thus, the 0 ℃ storage could effectively maintain the postharvest quality of Stropharia rugoso- annulata and inhibit its flavor deterioration.
-
Key words:
- Stropharia rugoso-annulata /
- storage /
- temperature /
- quality /
- volatile flavor components
-
图 2 不同贮藏温度对大球盖菇开伞率（a）、腐烂率（b）、失重率（c）的影响
Figure 2. Effect of different storage temperatures on cap opening rate (a), decay rate (b) and weight loss rate (c) of Stropharia rugoso-annulata
注：因大球盖菇样品腐烂，15 ℃贮藏组第10 d和12 d无法进行失重率测定。
图 3 不同贮藏温度对大球盖菇硬度（a）和咀嚼性（b）的影响
Figure 3. Effect of different storage temperatures on hardness (a) and chewiness (b) of Stropharia rugoso-annulata
注：因大球盖菇样品腐烂，15 ℃贮藏组第10 d和12 d无法进行硬度和咀嚼性测定。
图 4 不同贮藏温度下大球盖菇的挥发性物质分类
Figure 4. Classification of volatile substances of Stropharia rugoso-annulata at different storage temperatures
图 5 0 ℃（a）和 15 ℃（b）贮藏下大球盖菇的电子鼻雷达指纹图
Figure 5. Fingerprint chart of electronic nose of Stropharia rugoso-annulata storage at 0 ℃ (a) and 15 ℃ (b)
图 6 不同贮藏温度下大球盖菇的电子鼻主成分分析
Figure 6. PCA of electronic nose of Stropharia rugoso-annulata at different storage temperatures
注：因第12 d时只对0 ℃贮藏组进行了电子鼻检测，无法进行准确的PCA分析，故12 d时PCA数据缺失。
表 1 电子鼻传感器对应敏感物质类型
Table 1. Sensitive substance type of each electronic nose sensor
序号 传感器名称 敏感物质类型 1 LY2/LG 氯、氟、氮氧化合物、硫化物 2 LY2/G 氨、胺类化合物、氮氧化合物 3 LY2/AA 乙醇、丙酮、氨 4 LY2/GH 氨、胺类化合物 5 LY2/gCTL 硫化物 6 LY2/gCT 丙烷、丁烷 7 T30/1 极性化合物、氯化氢 8 P10/1 非极性；碳氢化合物、氨、氯 9 P10/2 非极性；甲烷、乙烷 10 P40/1 氟、氯 11 T70/2 甲苯、二甲苯、一氧化碳 12 PA/2 乙醇、氨水、胺类化合物 13 P30/1 碳氢化合物、氨、乙醇 14 P40/2 氯、硫化氢、氟化物 15 P30/2 硫化氢、酮 16 T40/2 氯 17 T40/1 氟 
下载: 导出CSV
表 2 不同贮藏温度下大球盖菇挥发性物质变化
Table 2. Changes of volatile substances of Stropharia rugoso-annulata at different storage temperatures
序号 化合物名称 相对含量（%） 0 d 4 d 8 d 12 d 0 ℃ 15 ℃ 0 ℃ 15 ℃ 0 ℃ 15 ℃ 0 ℃ 醇类 1 正己醇 9.21 18.17 18.52 18.00 46.39 22.16 18.86 2 3-辛醇 18.31 7.89 6.63 11.20 4.07 10.88 11.96 3 1-辛烯-3-醇 3.71 5.95 0.77 1.87 1.04 1.69 10.35 4 庚醇 − − − 0.76 0.72 0.48 0.53 5 1-戊醇 − − − 1.67 0.23 − − 6 顺-3-壬烯-1-醇 − − − − − − 0.12 7 2-亚甲基环己醇 − − 0.18 − − − − 8 3,5-辛二烯-2-醇 − − − − − − 0.05 9 1,10-癸二醇 − 0.63 − − − − − 10 芳樟醇 − − − − − 0.12 − 11 4-乙基-1-辛炔-3-醇 − − − − − 1.02 − 醛类 12 己醛 1.16 1.80 0.55 − 7.85 3.58 2.67 13 苯乙醛 0.34 0.53 0.60 0.56 0.39 − 0.69 14 反-2-辛烯醛 0.26 0.57 0.22 0.32 0.46 0.26 0.76 15 壬醛 0.14 0.32 0.19 0.21 0.27 0.24 0.83 16 癸醛 0.11 0.23 0.12 0.08 0.07 0.07 0.30 17 苯甲醛 − 0.25 − 0.36 − 4.41 0.28 18 反式-2,4-癸二烯醛 − − − − − − 0.74 酮类 19 3-辛酮 26.50 12.16 6.87 12.95 2.45 13.14 23.63 20 香叶基丙酮 − − − − − − 0.11 21 右旋香芹酮 − − − − − − 0.10 22 2-丙酮基环戊酮 − − 0.15 0.30 0.45 0.30 0.62 23 甲基壬基甲酮 − 0.24 − − − 0.25 − 酯类 24 甲酸庚酯 − 0.37 0.28 − − − − 25 γ-壬内酯 − − − − 0.42 − 0.61 26 4-甲氧基苯甲酸甲酯 − − − − − − 0.58 27 反式-2-十二烯-1-羟基-三氟乙酸酯 − − − − − 1.20 2.09 28 甲酸辛酯 − 0.39 − − − − 0.78 烯烃类 29 （Z）-3-乙基-2-甲基-1,3-己二烯 0.65 1.14 − − 1.37 − − 30 右旋萜二烯 − − 0.07 − − − 0.30 烷烃类 31 1,3,3,4-四甲基-2-氧杂双环[2.2.0]己烷 0.20 − − − − − − 32 1,2-环氧环庚烷 − − − − 0.19 − − 33 1-硝基己烷 − − − − − 0.12 − 酚类 34 4-仲丁基-2,6-二叔丁基苯酚 − − 0.11 − − − 0.15 呋喃类 35 2-戊基呋喃 0.26 0.70 0.63 1.06 1.03 0.83 0.89 吡嗪 36 2-甲氧基-3-仲丁基吡嗪 − − 0.16 − − − − 其他 37 2-甲基萘 − − − − 0.16 − 0.62 38 萘 − − − − 0.13 − − 39 1,3-二甲基萘 − − − − − − 0.18 40 邻异丙基甲苯 − − − − − − 0.08 41 1-乙烯基-氮杂环丙啶 − − − − − − 0.18 42 苯并噻唑 − − − − − − 0.26 43 偶氮二异丁腈 − − − − − − 0.16 44 6-甲基苯并噻吩 − − − − − − 0.06 45 1-甲基-2,3-二氢吲哚 − − − − − − 0.08 46 2,7-二甲基萘 − − − − − − 0.16 注:因大球盖菇样品腐烂，15 ℃贮藏组第12 d无法进行挥发性物质检测，图4~图6和表3同；“-”表示未检测到该物质，表3同。
下载: 导出CSV
表 3 不同贮藏温度下大球盖菇挥发性物质的ROAV值
Table 3. ROAV values of volatile substances in Stropharia rugoso-annulata at different storage temperatures
挥发性成分 阈值（μg/kg） ROAV值 0 d 4 d 8 d 12 d 0 ℃ 15 ℃ 0 ℃ 15 ℃ 0 ℃ 15℃ 0℃ 醇类 正己醇 250 0.99 1.22 0.05 3.85 10.64 5.24 0.71 3-辛醇 18 27.42 7.37 0.23 33.27 12.96 35.77 6.29 1-辛烯-3-醇 1 100 100 0.48 100 59.62 100 97.91 庚醇 3 − − − 13.55 13.76 9.47 1.67 1-戊醇 4000 − − − 0.02 − − − 芳樟醇 6 − − − − − 1.18 − 醛类 己醛 4.5 6.95 6.72 0.08 − 100 47.07 5.61 苯乙醛 4 2.29 2.23 0.09 7.49 5.59 − 1.63 反-2-辛烯醛 3 2.34 3.19 0.05 5.70 8.79 5.13 2.40 壬醛 1 3.77 5.38 0.12 11.23 15.48 14.20 7.85 癸醛 0.1 29.65 38.66 0.75 42.78 40.13 41.42 28.38 反式-2,4-癸二烯醛 0.07 − − − − − − 100 苯甲醛 350 − 0.01 − 0.06 − 0.75 − 酮类 3-辛酮 28 25.51 7.30 0.15 24.73 5.02 27.77 7.98 酯类 γ-壬内酯 65 − − − − 0.37 − 0.09 呋喃类 2-戊基呋喃 6 1.17 1.96 0.07 9.45 9.84 8.19 1.40 吡嗪 2-甲氧基-3-仲丁基吡嗪 0.001 − − 100 − − − −
下载: 导出CSV
-
[1] 曾先富, 熊维全, 李昕竺. 成都地区林下大球盖菇栽培技术关键[J]. 食用菌,2019,41(2):62−63. [ZENG X F, XIONG W Q, LI X Z. The key to the cultivation technology of Stropharia rugoso-annulata under the forest in Chengdu area[J]. Edible Fungi,2019,41(2):62−63. [2] LIU Y, HU C F, FENG X, et al. Isolation, characterization and antioxidant of polysaccharides from Stropharia rugosoannulata[J]. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules,2020,155:883−889. [3] WU J, FUSHIMI K, TOKUYAMA S, et al. Functional-food constituents in the fruiting bodies of Stropharia rugosoannulata[J]. Biosci Biotech Bioch,2011,75(8):1631−1634. doi: 10.1271/bbb.110308 [4] 殷朝敏, 范秀芝, 史德芳, 等. HS-SPME-GC-MS结合HPLC分析5种食用菌鲜品中的风味成分[J]. 食品工业科技,2019,40(3):254−260. [YIN C M, FAN X Z, SHI D F, et al. Flavor compounds analysis of 5 fresh mushrooms using HS-SPME-GC-MS and HPLC[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2019,40(3):254−260. [5] 朱铭亮. 大球盖菇微波真空干燥工艺的研究[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2009ZHU M L. Study on the technology of microwave vacuum drying about Stropharia rugoso-annulata[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2009. [6] 倪淑君, 张海峰, 田碧洁, 等. 大球盖菇采收后的初加工处理技术[J]. 黑龙江农业科学,2016,7:158. [NI S J, ZHANG H F, TIAN B J, et al. Primary processing and treatment of Stropharia rugoso-annulata after harvesting[J]. Heilongjiang Agricultural Sciences,2016,7:158. [7] 陈思. 大球盖菇的涂膜保鲜工艺及软罐头微波处理技术探讨[D]. 福州: 福建农林大学, 2013CHEN S. Preservation technology of Stropharia by thin film and the technology of microwave processing about soft canned of Stropharia[D]. Fuzhou: Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, 2013. [8] 陈婵, 黄靖, 彭宏, 等. 大球盖菇护色保鲜技术研究[J]. 农产品加工,2017,5:6−8. [CHEN C, HUANG J, PENG H, et al. Study on color-protection and fresh-keeping technology of Stropharia[J]. Farm Products Processing,2017,5:6−8. [9] 商立超, 弓志青, 王文亮, 等. 食用菌采后保鲜技术研究进展[J]. 山东农业科学,2022,54(7):149−156. [SHANG L C, GONG Z Q, WANG W L, et al. Research progress of postharvest preservation technology of edible fungi[J]. Shandong Agricultural Sciences,2022,54(7):149−156. [10] 周巧杰. 利用代谢网络通量控制分析对水蜜桃贮藏温度的优化[D]. 天津: 天津商业大学, 2020ZHOU Q J. Juicy honey peach storage temperature optimization by metabolic network flux control evaluation[D]. Tianjin: Tianjin University of Commerce, 2020. [11] 陈丽. 美味猕猴桃采后果实风味物质变化的研究[D]. 杭州: 浙江工商大学, 2018CHEN L. Study on changes in flavor components in kiwifruit during storage[D]. Hangzhou: Zhejiang Gongshang University, 2018. [12] 张晓玉. 贮藏温度对秀珍菇采后生理、呈味物质及能量代谢的影响[D]. 沈阳: 沈阳农业大学, 2017ZHANG X Y. Effects of different temperature storage on physiology, taste component and energy metabolism of Pleurotus geesteranus[D]. Shenyang: Shenyang Agricultural University, 2017. [13] GHEYSARBIGI S, MIRDEHGHAN S H, GHASEMNEZHAD M, et al. The inhibitory effect of nitric oxide on enzymatic browning reactions of in-package fresh pistachios (Pistacia vera L.)[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2020,159(C):110998. [14] GHOLAMI R, AHMADI E, FARRIS S. Shelf life extension of white mushrooms (Agaricus bisporus) by low temperatures conditioning, modified atmosphere, and nanocomposite packaging material[J]. Food Packaging and Shelf Life,2017,14:88−95. doi: 10.1016/j.fpsl.2017.09.001 [15] CONVERSA G, LAZZIZERA C, BONASIA A, et al. Harvest season and genotype affect head quality and shelflife of ready-to-use broccoli[J]. Agronomy,2020,10(4):527. doi: 10.3390/agronomy10040527 [16] HE Y, FAN G J, WU C E, et al. Influence of packaging materials on postharvest physiology and texture of garlic cloves during refrigeration storage[J]. Food Chemistry,2019,298:125019. doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125019 [17] 胡思. 大球盖菇菇粉的制备工艺研究及其产品开发[D]. 武汉: 华中农业大学, 2019HU S. Study on the preparation technology and product development of Stropharia rugoso-annulata powder[D]. Wuhan: Huazhong Agricultural University, 2019. [18] 李小林, 陈诚, 清源, 等. 会东县不同品种块菌挥发性香气成分的GC-MS分析[J]. 食品科学,2015,36(18):132−136. [LI X L, CHEN C, QING Y, et al. Analysis of volatile aroma components in different species of trufflfle in Huidong County by GC-MS[J]. Food Science,2015,36(18):132−136. doi: 10.7506/spkx1002-6630-201518024 [19] REI O, SHOJI K, MISAKI S, et al. Quality and microbial evaluation of fresh-cut apples during 10 days of supercooled storage[J]. Food Control,2021,126:108014. doi: 10.1016/j.foodcont.2021.108014 [20] BRAAKSMA A, SCHAAP D J, SCHIPPER C M. Time of harvest determines the post-harvest quality of the common mushroom Agaricus bisporus[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,1999,16(2):195−198. doi: 10.1016/S0925-5214(99)00019-8 [21] 李志刚, 宋婷, 冯翠萍, 等. 不同温度对杏鲍菇减压贮藏品质的影响[J]. 农业工程学报,2015,31(3):332−338. [LI Z G, SONG T, FENG C P, et al. Effect of different storage temperature on hypobaric storage quality of Pleurotus eryngii[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering,2015,31(3):332−338. [22] 刘梦, 张顺亮, 臧明伍, 等. 牛肉干法成熟过程挥发性风味物质的变化规律[J]. 食品科学,2022,43(16):279−284. [LIU M, ZHANG S L, ZANG M W, et al. Dynamic changes of volatile compounds of beef during the dry-aging process[J]. Food Science,2022,43(16):279−284. [23] 赵宇. 双孢蘑菇保鲜过程中风味物质变化[D]. 上海: 上海应用技术大学, 2019ZHAO Y. Changes of flavor substances during the preservation of Agaricus bisporus[D]. Shanghai: Shanghai Institute of Technology, 2019. [24] YI C P, LI Y S, ZHU H, et al. Effect of Lactobacillus plantarum fermentation on the volatile flavors of mung beans[J]. LWT,2021,146:111434. doi: 10.1016/j.lwt.2021.111434 [25] ZHU Y F, CHEN J, CHEN X J, et al. Use of relative odor activity value (ROAV) to link aroma profiles to volatile compounds: Application to fresh and dried eel (Muraenesox cinereus)[J]. International Journal of Food Properties,2020,23(1):2257−2270. doi: 10.1080/10942912.2020.1856133 [26] 王霆, 贠建民, 毕阳, 等. 双孢蘑菇采后品质劣变过程中风味物质的变化规律[J]. 食品与发酵工业,2022,48(6):39−45. [WANG T, YUN J M, BI Y, et al. Study on the variation of flavor substances during the quality deterioration of Agaricus bisporus[J]. Food and Fermentation Industries,2022,48(6):39−45. [27] 赵泽伟, 丁筑红, 许培振, 等. 基于SPME-GC-MS和电子鼻分析方法分析薏仁饮料贮藏过程风味化合物变化[J]. 食品科学,2018,39(14):276−281. [ZHAO Z W, DING Z H, XU P Z, et al. Change of flavor compounds in coix seed beverage during storage analyzed by SPME-GC-MS and electronic nose[J]. Food Science,2018,39(14):276−281. [28] 胡志全, 王海洋, 刘友明. 电子鼻识别大米挥发性物质的应用性研究[J]. 中国粮油学报,2013,28(7):93−98,3. [HU Z Q, WANG H Y, LIU Y M. Application of electronic nose to identify volatile substances in rice[J]. Journal of the Chinese Cereals and Oils Association,2013,28(7):93−98,3. [29] 章潇天, 张慜, 过志梅. 超声波-气调联合处理对番茄、丝瓜混合贮藏保鲜效果的影响[J]. 食品与生物技术学报,2020,39(12):62−70. [ZHANG X T, ZHANG M, GUO Z M. Effect of ultrasound combined with modified atmosphere packaging on preservation quality of tomato and loofah mixed storage[J]. Journal of Food Science and Biotechnology,2020,39(12):62−70. [30] MAKARICHIAN A, AMIRI C R, AHMADI E, et al. Assessment the influence of different drying methods and pre-storage periods on garlic (Allium sativum L.) aroma using electronic nose[J]. Food and Bioproducts Processing,2021,2:16. [31] 罗枫, 鲁晓翔, 张鹏, 等. 不同温度对货架期樱桃挥发性物质变化的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2015,36(13):347−351. [LUO F, LU X X, ZHANG P, et al. Study on aroma compounds of cherry under different temperature during shelf life[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry,2015,36(13):347−351. [32] XUE Z H, HAO J F, YU W C, et al. Effects of processing and storage preservation technologies on nutritional quality and biological activities of edible fungi: A review[J]. Journal of Food Process Engineering,2017,40(3):1. [33] 鲁焱兴. 真空预冷技术与气调包装延长香菇保藏期的研究[D]. 哈尔滨: 哈尔滨商业大学, 2020LU Y X. Extending shelf life of lentinus edodes by vacuum pre-cooling and modified atmosphere packaging[D]. Harbin: Harbin University of Commerce, 2020. [34] JAWORSKA G, SIDOR A, PYCIA K, et al. Packaging method and storage temperature affects microbiological quality and content of biogenic amines in Agaricus bisporus fruiting bodies[J]. Food Bioscience,2020,37:100736. doi: 10.1016/j.fbio.2020.100736 [35] 吴洋, 李逸钊, 何兴兴, 等. 不同贮藏温度下金玉兰菜的品质变化及其货架期预测[J]. 包装工程,2022,43(11):115−125. [WU Y, LI Y Z, HE X X, et al. Quality change and shelf life prediction of Cichorium intybus L. var. Foliosum Hegi. at different storage temperatures[J]. Packaging Engineering,2022,43(11):115−125. doi: 10.19554/j.cnki.1001-3563.2022.11.015 [36] 刘聪, 李亚珍, 尹嘉敏, 等. 不同贮藏温度对磴口华莱士蜜瓜质构特性、理化指标、感官品质变化及相关性分析[J]. 中国瓜菜,2022,35(1):47−53. [LIU C, LI Y Z, YIN J M, et al. Correlation analysis of changes in texture characteristics, physical and chemical indexes and sensory quality of Dengkou Hualaishi melon at different storage temperatures[J]. China Cucurbits and Vegetables,2022,35(1):47−53. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2871.2022.01.008 [37] CUI K B, ZHAO H D, SUN L N, et al. Impact of near freezing temperature storage on postharvest quality and antioxidant capacity of two apricot (Prunus armeniaca L.) cultivars[J]. Journal of Food Biochemistry,2019,43(7):110296. [38] ANTMANN G, ARES G, LEMA P, et al. Influence of modified atmosphere packaging on sensory quality of shiitake mushrooms[J]. Postharvest Biology and Technology,2008,49(1):164−170. doi: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2008.01.020 [39] 何奎, 贠建民, 毕阳, 等. 纳米膜包装真姬菇贮藏期间挥发性风味成分变化分析[J]. 食品科学,2021,42(20):160−166. [HE K, YUN J M, BI Y, et al. Changes of volatile flavor components in Hypsizygus marmoreus packaged with nano-film during storage[J]. Food Science,2021,42(20):160−166. [40] 李润, 杨焱, 刘晓风, 等. 食用菌风味影响因素及其评价研究进展[J]. 食用菌学报,2020,27(4):202−214. [LI R, YANG Y, LIU X F, et al. Research progress on influential factors and evaluation of edible fungi flavor[J]. Acta Edulis Fungi,2020,27(4):202−214. -
点击查看大图
图(6) / 表(3)
计量
- 文章访问数: 80
- HTML全文浏览量: 25
- PDF下载量: 11
- 被引次数: 0
