• EI
  • Scopus
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 北大核心期刊
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • 中国生物医学SinoMed
中国精品科技期刊2020
于艳奇,杨明源,吕春茂,等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的板栗品质综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(2):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020255.
引用本文: 于艳奇,杨明源,吕春茂,等. 基于主成分及聚类分析的板栗品质综合评价[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(2):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020255.
YU Yanqi, YANG Mingyuan, LÜ Chunmao, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Chestnut Quality Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(2): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020255.
Citation: YU Yanqi, YANG Mingyuan, LÜ Chunmao, et al. Comprehensive Evaluation of Chestnut Quality Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(2): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024020255.

基于主成分及聚类分析的板栗品质综合评价

Comprehensive Evaluation of Chestnut Quality Based on Principal Component and Cluster Analysis

  • 摘要: 为建立一种适宜的板栗资源果实品质评价方法,本研究以25个板栗品种为研究对象,选取21项品质指标进行测定,通过主成分分析结合相关性分析、描述性统计分析的方法筛选影响板栗品质的核心评价指标,基于熵权法对核心指标赋予权重,并建立灰色关联度评价模型。结果表明,不同品种板栗多项指标存在显著差异(P<0.05),且多个指标间存在显著相关性,主成分分析确立了水分、直链淀粉与支链淀粉含量的比值(Ratio of amylose to amylopectin,AA)、总黄酮、好果率、果形指数、硬度、可溶性糖和还原糖为核心指标,熵权法计算核心指标的权重分别为14.08%、14.64%、15.64%、7.74%、9.41%、9.11%、18.90%、10.48%。灰色关联度分析结果表明,丹栗1号、丹东9113和qX-005综合品质列前三位。经聚类分析将25个品种板栗分为4类,第一类板栗适宜开发功能性饮品;第二类板栗适合取仁加工,制作罐头、果脯等产品,或加工成板栗粉用于面包、饼干等产品的制作;第三类板栗可作为优质的食品原料;第四类板栗适宜炒食,也适宜作为直售坚果。本研究结果为板栗优质资源筛选及品种的选育提供参考,也为各品种的综合利用提供了理论依据。

     

    Abstract: This research was conducted to develop an appropriate method for evaluating the quality of chestnut resources. The 21 quality indicators of 25 chestnut varieties were detected and analyzed. The key indicators of affecting the quality of chestnut were selected through principal component analysis (PCA) coupled with correlation analysis and descriptive statistical analysis. The weights of these key indicators were calculated based on the entropy weight method to construct the gray correlation evaluation model. Our findings revealed notable differences (P<0.05) in various quality indicators among the different chestnut varieties and observed significant correlations among several of these indicators. The key indicators identified by PCA included moisture, the ratio of amylose to amylopectin (AA), total flavonoids, good fruiting rate, fruit shape index, hardness, soluble sugar, and reducing sugar. The weights of these key indicators obtained by entropy weighting methods were 14.08%, 14.64%, 15.64%, 7.74%, 9.41%, 9.11%, 18.90%, and 10.48%, respectively. The gray correlation analysis indicated that the overall qualities of the varieties Danli No.1, Dandong 9113, and qX-005 ranked among the top three. The 25 chestnut varieties were categorized into four groups by cluster analysis. The first group was ideal for developing functional beverages; the second is suited for kernel processing into canned food, preserved fruit, or chestnut powder for baked goods. The third group served as a high-quality food ingredient and the fourth group was best for frying and as a direct-sale nut. This study provides valuable insights for selecting superior resources and breeding high-quality chestnut varieties, while also laying a theoretical foundation for the comprehensive utilization of each type of chestnut.

     

/

返回文章
返回