• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
杨应,马婉君,尤秋爽,等. 六堡茶及其原料毛茶的非挥发性成分差异分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(15):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024070306.
引用本文: 杨应,马婉君,尤秋爽,等. 六堡茶及其原料毛茶的非挥发性成分差异分析[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(15):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024070306.
YANG Ying, MA Wanjun, YOU Qiushuang, et al. Differences in Non-volatile Chemical Components between Liupao Tea and Its Raw Material[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(15): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024070306.
Citation: YANG Ying, MA Wanjun, YOU Qiushuang, et al. Differences in Non-volatile Chemical Components between Liupao Tea and Its Raw Material[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(15): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024070306.

六堡茶及其原料毛茶的非挥发性成分差异分析

Differences in Non-volatile Chemical Components between Liupao Tea and Its Raw Material

  • 摘要: 采用超高效液相色谱/串联质谱(UPLC-MS/MS)等技术研究分析六堡茶及其原料毛茶中主要非挥发性化学成分的差异,并结合多元统计分析筛选关键差异代谢物。结果表明,六堡茶水浸出物、茶多酚、水溶性碳水化合物、游离氨基酸以及总黄酮的含量均显著低于原料毛茶(P<0.05)。在六堡茶及其原料毛茶中鉴定出了569个化合物,可分为脂质、氨基酸及其衍生物、类黄酮和生物碱等11类化合物;并筛选出了146个差异代谢化合物(VIP>1,P<0.01),其中有32个差异代谢物的相对含量在六堡茶中显著高于原料毛茶,而114个差异代谢物在六堡茶中显著低于原料毛茶。此外,与原料毛茶相比,六堡茶中,儿茶素类和氨基酸类等一些关键滋味成分,以及茶黄素和黄酮糖苷类等一些关键呈色成分的相对含量均显著降低(P<0.01)。研究结果揭示了六堡茶与其原料毛茶中主要化学成分的差异,为阐明六堡茶品质形成的化学物质基础提供依据。

     

    Abstract: The differences in the major non-volatile chemical components between Liupao tea (LPT) and its raw material (LPM) were analyzed using ultra-high performance liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) alongside other analytical methods, and the key differential metabolites were identified through multivariate statistical analyses. Results indicated that the levels of water extracts, tea polyphenols, water-soluble carbohydrates, free amino acids, and total flavonoids in LPT were significantly decreased compared with those observed in LPM (P<0.05). A total of 569 chemical compounds were identified in both LPT and LPM, which could be classified into 11 groups, primarily including lipids, amino acid and their derivatives, flavonoids, alkaloids, and others. Furthermore, 146 differential metabolic compounds were detected (VIP>1, P<0.01), among which 32 exhibited significant increases while 114 showed significant reduced in LPT compared to LPM. Additionally, further analysis revealed that the relative concentrations of key flavor components such as catechins and amino acids, as well as color-related components, such as theaflavins and flavonoid glycosides, were significantly lower in LPT compared with LPM (P<0.01). These findings elucidate the differences in major non-volatile chemical components between LPM and LPT, and might provide a foundation for understanding the chemical basis of the quality formation of Liupao tea.

     

/

返回文章
返回