• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
苟国源,贾琅,李苓蕾,等. 不同品种青稞的品质特性及其对血糖生成指数的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(23):310−318. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110081.
引用本文: 苟国源,贾琅,李苓蕾,等. 不同品种青稞的品质特性及其对血糖生成指数的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(23):310−318. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110081.
GOU Guoyuan, JIA Lang, LI Linglei, et al. Quality Characteristics of Different Varieties of Highland Barleyand Their Impact on Glycemic Index[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(23): 310−318. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110081.
Citation: GOU Guoyuan, JIA Lang, LI Linglei, et al. Quality Characteristics of Different Varieties of Highland Barleyand Their Impact on Glycemic Index[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(23): 310−318. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110081.

不同品种青稞的品质特性及其对血糖生成指数的影响

Quality Characteristics of Different Varieties of Highland Barleyand Their Impact on Glycemic Index

  • 摘要: 本文旨在研究不同品种青稞的品质特性对血糖生成指数的影响,系统比较了12种青稞的硬度、粉体粒度、营养成分、糊化特性以及体外消化特性之间的差异,以及各指标对青稞预测血糖生成指数(EGI)的影响。结果表明,各营养成分在不同品种青稞间无明显规律,但籽粒的硬度会影响粉碎结果,硬度越大,粉体粒径通常越大。不同品种青稞粉糊化特性的不同不仅与淀粉颗粒结构、淀粉含量和直链淀粉含量有关,也与存在的非淀粉成分的不同有关。通过相关性分析发现,青稞的EGI与各营养成分之间存在不同程度的相关性。EGI与直链淀粉和β-葡聚糖含量之间均呈显著负相关(P≤0.05),与蛋白质、多酚、粉体粒径和谷物籽粒硬度存在一定程度负相关。结合主成分分析与聚类分析,选出具有低EGI值、高直链、高β-葡聚糖和高蛋白质含量的优质青稞品种:柴青1、海西昆仑15、藏青3000及北青8,其综合主成分得分为149.191,EGI平均值为78.775。最终确定了品质最佳且血糖生成指数最低的青稞品种——藏青3000(EGI值为75.51),为青藏地区青稞品种的筛选与种植提供了重要的理论依据。

     

    Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effects of quality characteristics of different highland barley varieties on the glycemic index. A systematic comparison was conducted on the hardness, powder particle size, nutritional composition, gelatinization properties, and in vitro digestibility of 12 highland barley varieties. The influence of these factors on the estimated glycemic index (EGI) of highland barley was also analyzed. The results indicated that there was no consistent pattern in the nutritional composition among the different highland barley varieties. However, the hardness of the grains significantly influenced the grinding results; higher hardness typically led to larger particle sizes in the flour. The differences in the gelatinization properties of the highland barley flour from various varieties were not only associated with starch granule structure, starch content, and amylose content, but also with the variations in non-starch components present in the grains. Correlation analysis revealed varying degrees of association between EGI and the nutritional components of highland barley. EGI exhibited a significant negative correlation with amylose and β-glucan content (P≤0.05) and a certain degree of negative correlation with protein, polyphenols, powder particle size, and grain hardness. Through principal component analysis and cluster analysis, high-quality highland barley varieties with low EGI, high amylose, high β-glucan, and high protein content were identified: Chaiqing 1, Haixi Kunlun 15, Zangqing 3000, and Beiqing 8. These varieties had a comprehensive principal component score of 149.191 and an average EGI of 78.775. Ultimately, Zangqing 3000, with the best quality and the lowest EGI (75.51), was identified as the optimal variety. These findings provide an important theoretical basis for selecting and cultivating highland barley varieties in the Qinghai-Tibet region.

     

/

返回文章
返回