• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
李慧星,祁鸿冉,许彬,等. 不同糖化方法对威士忌中挥发性物质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(24):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110351.
引用本文: 李慧星,祁鸿冉,许彬,等. 不同糖化方法对威士忌中挥发性物质的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(24):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110351.
LI Huixing, QI Hongran, XU Bin, et al. Effects of Different Saccharification Methods on Volatile Substances in Whisky[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(24): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110351.
Citation: LI Huixing, QI Hongran, XU Bin, et al. Effects of Different Saccharification Methods on Volatile Substances in Whisky[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(24): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024110351.

不同糖化方法对威士忌中挥发性物质的影响

Effects of Different Saccharification Methods on Volatile Substances in Whisky

  • 摘要: 研究不同糖化方法对威士忌新酒中挥发性物质的影响。采用4种分步糖化发酵方法(双醪浸出糖化法(SJ)、双醪一次煮出糖化法(SY)、双醪二次煮出糖化法(SE)、原料单独糖化法(DD))和2种同步糖化发酵方法(熟料同步糖化发酵法(TB)、生料同步糖化发酵法(SL))酿造威士忌,通过电子鼻、顶空固相微萃取结合全二维气相色谱-四极杆串联飞行时间质谱(headspace solid-phase microextraction/comprehensive two-dimensional gas chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry,HS-SPME/GC×GC-Q-TOF MS)分析威士忌新酒中挥发性物质。结果表明,熟料同步糖化发酵方法的酒样(TB-J)与其他酒样有明显的气味差异,TB-J中硫化物、氮氧化合物、醇醚醛酮类、烷类的含量显著(P<0.05)低于其他酒样。2种同步糖化发酵方法的酒样(TB-J、SL-J)的挥发性物质种类总数(109种、114种)多于4种分步糖化发酵方法的酒样(SJ-J、SY-J、SE-J、DD-J)的挥发性物质种类总数(82种、90种、92种、94种)。筛选出同步糖化发酵方法的酒样与分步糖化发酵方法的酒样的关键差异挥发性物质有3种(1-辛烯-3-醇、芳樟醇、异戊酸乙酯),对风味有重要影响的差异挥发性物质有13种。芳樟醇、反式-橙花叔醇、己酸-2-苯乙酯的含量在同步糖化发酵方法的酒样中较低,异戊酸乙酯、2-十一醇、壬醛、1-辛醇、月桂酸乙酯、反式-2-壬烯醛、1-壬醇、香叶基丙酮、1-癸醇、1-辛烯-3-醇、己醛、苯乙醛、苯丙酸乙酯的含量在同步糖化发酵方法的酒样中较高。研究结果为采用同步糖化发酵方法酿造威士忌提供技术支持和参考。

     

    Abstract: In the present study, the effects of various saccharification methods on volatile substances in unaged whiskies were investigated. The whisky was prepared using four separate hydrolysis and fermentation methods: double-mash leaching saccharification method (SJ), double mash method with a single boil for saccharification (SY), double mash second boil-out saccharification method (SE), and individual saccharification of raw materials (DD), and two simultaneous saccharification and fermentation processes: simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of clinker (TB) and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of raw materials (SL). Volatile substances in the unaged whisky were analyzed using electronic nose and headspace solid-phase microextraction (HS-SPME) coupled with comprehensive two-dimensional (2D) gas chromatography quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. The samples obtained using the separate clinker hydrolysis and fermentation method (TB-J) had significant odor differences from those obtained using the other methods. Furthermore, The contents of sulfur compounds, nitrogen oxides, alcohols, ethers, aldehydes, ketones, and alkanes in TB-J were significantly (P<0.05) lower than those in other methods. The total number of volatile substances detected in the samples from the two simultaneous saccharification and fermentation methods (TB-J (109) and SL-J (114)) was higher than that in the samples from the four separate hydrolysis and fermentation methods (SJ-J (82), SY-J (90), SE-J (92), and DD-J (94)). Three key volatile substances (1-octen-3-ol, linalool, and ethyl isovalerate) were screened between the samples from the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation methods and from the separate hydrolysis and fermentation methods, and a total of 13 differential volatile substances with important effects on flavor were screened. Linalool, trans-nerolidol, hexanoic acid, and 2-phenylethyl ester contents were lower in samples subjected to the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation methods. The contents of the remaining 13 substances (ethyl isovalerate, 2-undecanol, nonanal, 1-octanol, dodecanoic acid, ethyl ester, trans-2-nonenal, 1-nonanol, geranylacetone, 1-decanol, 1-octen-3-ol, hexanal, benzeneacetaldehyde, benzenepropanoic acid, and ethyl ester) were higher in the samples subjected to the simultaneous saccharification and fermentation methods. The findings of this study provide technical support and an informative reference for the use of simultaneous saccharification and fermentation methods for whisky production.

     

/

返回文章
返回