• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
陈静,林馨颖,阙玉林,等. 基于HS-SPME-GC-MS技术分析不同年份福鼎栀子花白茶挥发性香气组分差异J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(6):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010191.
引用本文: 陈静,林馨颖,阙玉林,等. 基于HS-SPME-GC-MS技术分析不同年份福鼎栀子花白茶挥发性香气组分差异J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(6):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010191.
CHEN Jing, LIN Xinying, QUE Yulin, et al. Analysis of Volatile Aroma Component Differences in Fuding Gardenia-scented White Tea with Different Scenting Years Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS TechnologyJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(6): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010191.
Citation: CHEN Jing, LIN Xinying, QUE Yulin, et al. Analysis of Volatile Aroma Component Differences in Fuding Gardenia-scented White Tea with Different Scenting Years Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS TechnologyJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(6): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010191.

基于HS-SPME-GC-MS技术分析不同年份福鼎栀子花白茶挥发性香气组分差异

Analysis of Volatile Aroma Component Differences in Fuding Gardenia-scented White Tea with Different Scenting Years Based on HS-SPME-GC-MS Technology

  • 摘要: 为探究福鼎栀子花白茶挥发性香气组分的年份差异,采用顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用技术(Headspace Solid-Phase Microextraction-Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry,HS-SPME-GC-MS)、感官评价和相对气味活度值(relative odor activity value,ROAV)对窨制前茶坯及窨制后栀子花白茶及不同窨制年份(2021年、2023年)香气成分进行测定并分析对比。结果显示,窨制前茶坯及窨制后栀子花白茶挥发性成分共检测出492种,不同窨制年份栀子花白茶挥发性成分共检测出378种。以VIP>1,P<0.05为条件筛选出对栀子花白茶香气起决定性作用的香气成分共有89种,包含果实甜香型、花蜜甜香型、花香型、木质香、草本香、脂香的香气物质。窨制前茶坯及窨制后栀子花白茶呈香成分(ROAV>10)主要为邻甲氨基苯甲酸甲酯、异戊酸苯乙酯、1-辛烯-3-酮等赋予栀子花白茶柑橘柠檬香甜果味,玫瑰花香甜味等方面的香气。结合ROAV分析不同窨制年份对比挥发性成分的差异,2021年对比2023年栀子花白茶的差异关键挥发性成分共19种,其中可作为区分不同生产窨制年份的香气为苯甲酸甲酯、异戊酸苯乙酯、癸酸甲酯等赋予品质较好的2023年栀子花白茶花果甜香鲜灵持久的香气特征。研究结果以VIP>1,P<0.05为条件筛选出10种福鼎栀子花白茶的关键挥发性香气成分:苯甲酸甲酯、2-甲基丁酸2-甲基丁酯、异戊酸苯乙酯、(E,E)-3,5-辛二烯-2-酮、反式-2,4-癸二烯醛、正壬醛、芳樟醇、β-紫罗兰酮,表现为窨制后栀子花白茶对比素茶坯,香气成分种类丰富且活性升高,2023年栀子花白茶香气较之2021年香气活性升高,可作为判别新栀子花白茶品质佳的依据,以上结果可为福鼎栀子花白茶品质评价及综合开发利用提供了科学依据。

     

    Abstract: This study investigated the vintage variations in volatile aroma components of Fuding Gardenia-scented white tea using HS-SPME-GC-MS, sensory evaluation, and ROAV analysis. Comparative analysis was conducted on unscented tea blanks, scented tea products, and teas from different production years (2021 and 2023). A total of 492 volatile compounds were identified in both unscented blanks and scented tea,while 378 compounds were detected across different production years. VIP analysis (VIP>1, P<0.05) identified 89 decisive aroma compounds categorized as: Fruity-sweet, floral-honey sweet, floral, woody, herbal, fatty notes. ROAV>10 components including methyl anthranilate, phenethyl isovalerate, and 1-octen-3-one contributed citrusy, sweet-fruity, and rosy floral characteristics. Comparative analysis revealed 19 key differential compounds between 2021 and 2023 vintages. Methyl benzoate, phenethyl isovalerate, and methyl decanoate were characteristic of the superior 2023 vintage, imparting more intense and persistent floral-fruity notes. Ten critical markers (VIP>1, P<0.05) were identified: Methyl benzoate, 2-methylbutyrate, Phenethylisovalerate, (E,E)-3,5-Octadien-2-one, Nonanal, trans-2,4-Decadienal, Linalool, β-Ionone. Post-scenting Gardenia-White Tea exhibited greater aroma diversity and higher odor activity compared to unscented tea blanks. The 2023 vintage showed enhanced aroma activity over the 2021 batch, serving as a marker for superior quality in newer productions. These findings provide a scientific basis for quality assessment and utilization of Fuding Gardenia-scented white tea.

     

/

返回文章
返回