• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
倪申宇,李琦,李平,等. 牛肉不同部位对调理牛排品质及挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(24):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010218.
引用本文: 倪申宇,李琦,李平,等. 牛肉不同部位对调理牛排品质及挥发性成分的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,2025,46(24):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010218.
NI Shenyu, LI Qi, LI Ping, et al. Effects of Different Beef Parts on the Quality and Volatile Components of Processed Steaks[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(24): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010218.
Citation: NI Shenyu, LI Qi, LI Ping, et al. Effects of Different Beef Parts on the Quality and Volatile Components of Processed Steaks[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(24): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025010218.

牛肉不同部位对调理牛排品质及挥发性成分的影响

Effects of Different Beef Parts on the Quality and Volatile Components of Processed Steaks

  • 摘要: 本研究旨在分析牛肉不同部位对调理牛排品质及风味的影响。以牛腿肉、牛肩胛、牛上脑、牛臀肉、牛腩肉五个部位的调理牛排为研究对象,对其色泽、pH、脂质氧化水平、质构进行分析,通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(gaschromatography-mass spectrometry,GC-MS)和电子鼻技术检测挥发性化合物,结合偏最小二乘判别分析(PLS-DA),明确牛肉部位对调理牛排品质和风味的影响。结果表明:牛肩胛和牛上脑的L*值及a*值显著偏高(P<0.05);牛臀肉与牛肩胛的pH值与其他部位相比差异显著(P<0.05);牛腩肉和牛上脑的TBARS(硫代巴比妥酸)值显著偏高(P<0.05);质构上,牛腿肉硬度最高,牛上脑弹性最佳;电子鼻能有效区分不同牛肉部位制作的调理牛排,其中牛腩肉与牛腿肉差异较大;通过GC-MS鉴定,发现46种挥发性风味化合物,其中醛类化合物普遍含量较高,与其他的部位相比,牛上脑和牛腩产生的挥发性化合物种类和含量显著偏多。PLS-DA分析筛选出20种差异显著的香气物质,气味活性值(Order Activity Value,OAV)分析结果表明,E-2-辛烯醛、正辛醛、3-羟基-2-丁酮、正庚醛和正戊醛对调理牛排风味可能有突出贡献。感官上,牛上脑的综合评分最高。综上,采用不同的牛肉部位制作调理牛排,以牛上脑为原料品质与风味俱佳。研究结果可为调理牛排加工工艺和风味特征辨别提供数据参考。

     

    Abstract: The aim of this study is to analyze the effects of different beef parts on the quality and flavor of processed steaks.The processed steaks from five beef parts, including beef shank, beef shoulder, beef chuck, beef rump, and beef brisket, were selected as the research subjects. Their color, pH, lipid oxidation levels, and texture properties were analyzed. Volatile compounds were detected using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and electronic nose technology. Partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA) was used to clarify the influence of beef cuts on the quality and flavor of processed steaks.The results indicated that the L* and a* values of beef shoulder and beef chuck were significantly higher (P<0.05). Significant differences in pH values were observed between beef rump and beef shoulder compared to other parts (P<0.05). The TBARS (thiobarbituric acid reactive substances) values of beef brisket and beef chuck were significantly higher (P<0.05). In terms of texture, the highest hardness was found in beef shank, while the best elasticity was observed in beef chuck. The electronic nose was able to effectively distinguish processed steaks made from different beef parts, with a significant difference observed between beef brisket and beef shank.Through GC-MS identification, 46 volatile flavor compounds were found, with aldehydes generally having higher concentrations. Compared to other parts, the types and contents of volatile compounds produced by beef chuck and beef brisket were significantly higher. PLS-DA analysis identified 20 significantly different aroma substances, and the odor activity value (OAV) analysis indicated that E-2-octenal, hexanal, 3-hydroxy-2-butanone, heptanal, and pentanal may contribute significantly to the flavor of processed steaks.Sensory evaluation revealed that the highest overall score was obtained for beef chuck. In conclusion, processed steaks made from different beef parts, with beef chuck as the raw material, were found to have excellent quality and flavor. The research results can provide data references for the processing techniques and flavor characteristic identification of processed steaks.

     

/

返回文章
返回