• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
刘乐乐,潘瑶,李红艳. 提取方式对茶叶籽油品质的影响及其油凝胶的制备与理化性质表征J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(7):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030169.
引用本文: 刘乐乐,潘瑶,李红艳. 提取方式对茶叶籽油品质的影响及其油凝胶的制备与理化性质表征J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(7):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030169.
LIU Lele, PAN Yao, LI Hongyan. Effects of Extraction Methods on Tea Seed Oil Quality and Physicochemical Characterization of Prepared OleogelsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(7): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030169.
Citation: LIU Lele, PAN Yao, LI Hongyan. Effects of Extraction Methods on Tea Seed Oil Quality and Physicochemical Characterization of Prepared OleogelsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(7): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030169.

提取方式对茶叶籽油品质的影响及其油凝胶的制备与理化性质表征

Effects of Extraction Methods on Tea Seed Oil Quality and Physicochemical Characterization of Prepared Oleogels

  • 摘要: 本研究对比热榨法、溶剂浸提法、水剂法及水酶法对茶叶籽油(tea seed oil,TSO)品质的影响,并分别制备基于单甘酯(monoglyceride,MG)、蜂蜡(beeswax,BW)、米糠蜡(rice bran wax,RBW)和γ-谷维素/β-谷甾醇(γ-oryzanol/β-sitosterol,SO)的油凝胶,系统表征其理化性质。结果表明:TSO脂肪酸组成不受提取方式影响,主要成分为油酸、亚油酸、棕榈酸及硬脂酸。其中,溶剂浸提法提取率最高(94.92%±2.68%),酸价(0.46±0.01 mg KOH/g)与过氧化值(0.03±0.00 g/100 g)较低,α-生育酚(249.78±15.84 mg/kg)和角鲨烯(186.56±10.99 mg/kg)含量较高,但总酚(111.11±8.96 mg GAE/kg)及总甾醇(3695.82±215.45 mg/kg)含量较低;相比之下,水酶法提取率次之(85.55%±3.64%),且酸价(0.59±0.01 mg KOH/g)与过氧化值(0.02±0.00 g/100g)接近溶剂浸提法,α-生育酚(225.91±13.75 mg/kg)、总酚(144.58±2.87 mg GAE/kg)、角鲨烯(177.96±1.48 mg/kg)含量与溶剂浸提法的TSO之间均没有显著性差异(P>0.05),而植物甾醇的含量(4867.15±265.33 mg/kg)远高于溶剂浸提法提取的TSO,同时兼具环保性与活性成分保留优势,因此为最优提取方式。进一步研究发现,4种茶叶籽油凝胶的持油率均>93%,其中MG与SO油凝胶存在范德华力与氢键相互作用,而BW和RBW油凝胶仅具范德华力;X-射线衍射分析表明,MG、BW和RBW油凝胶含有ββ′晶型,SO油凝胶仅含β晶型。物性测试显示,SO凝胶持油性(99.23%±1.68%)与硬度(5497.80±508.83 g)最高但涂抹性能较差,而MG油凝胶硬度(746.47±58.29 g)与持油性(97.80%±1.39%)表现均衡,适于作为固体脂肪替代品。综上,水酶法是提取茶叶籽油的最佳方式,单甘酯油凝胶最适合替代固体脂肪产品。

     

    Abstract: This study investigated the effects of hot pressing, solvent extraction, aqueous extraction, and aqueous enzymatic extraction on the quality of tea seed oil (TSO) and systematically characterized the physicochemical properties of oleogels prepared using monoglyceride (MG), beeswax (BW), rice bran wax (RBW), and γ-oryzanol/β-sitosterol (SO) as structuring agents. Results indicated that the fatty acid composition of TSO remained consistent across extraction methods, predominantly comprising oleic acid, linoleic acid, palmitic acid, and stearic acid. Solvent extraction achieved the highest yield (94.92%±2.68%), with lower acid value (0.46±0.01 mg KOH/g) and peroxide value (0.03±0.00 g/100 g), along with higher α-tocopherol (249.78±15.84 mg/kg) and squalene (186.56±10.99 mg/kg) contents. However, it exhibited lower total phenolics (111.11±8.96 mg GAE/kg) and total sterols (3695.82±215.45 mg/kg). In contrast, aqueous enzymatic extraction yielded 85.55%±3.64% oil, with comparable acid value (0.59±0.01 mg KOH/g), peroxide value (0.02±0.00 g/100g), α-tocopherol (225.91±13.75 mg/kg), total phenolics (144.58±2.87 mg GAE/kg), and squalene (177.96±1.48 mg/kg) to solvent extraction (all P>0.05). Notably, it demonstrated significantly higher phytosterol content (4867.15±265.33 mg/kg) and environmental compatibility, establishing it as the optimal method for balancing extraction efficiency, bioactive retention, and sustainability. All four oleogels exhibited oil-binding capacities exceeding 93%. MG- and SO-based oleogels involved van der Waals forces and hydrogen bonding, while BW and RBW oleogels relied solely on van der Waals interactions. X-ray diffraction revealed β and β′ polymorphs in MG, BW, and RBW oleogels, whereas SO oleogels exclusively formed β crystals. Texture analysis indicated that SO oleogels exhibited the highest oil-binding capacity (99.23%±1.68%) and hardness (5497.80±508.83 g) but poor spreadability. Conversely, MG oleogels balanced moderate hardness (746.47±58.29 g) and oil retention (97.80%±1.39%), rendering them suitable for solid fat replacement. In conclusion, aqueous enzymatic extraction is the preferred method for TSO production, and MG-based oleogel shows optimal potential as a solid fat substitute in food applications.

     

/

返回文章
返回