• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
彭丽君,刘云鹤,黄峰,等. 不同热加工-复热方式组合对鸡肉关键营养组分与氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,xxxx,x(x):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030391.
引用本文: 彭丽君,刘云鹤,黄峰,等. 不同热加工-复热方式组合对鸡肉关键营养组分与氧化特性的影响[J]. 食品工业科技,xxxx,x(x):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030391.
PENG Lijun, LIU Yunhe, HUANG Feng, et al. Effects of Different Combinations of Heat Processing-reheating Methods on Key Nutrient Components and Oxidation Characteristics of Chicken[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, xxxx, x(x): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030391.
Citation: PENG Lijun, LIU Yunhe, HUANG Feng, et al. Effects of Different Combinations of Heat Processing-reheating Methods on Key Nutrient Components and Oxidation Characteristics of Chicken[J]. Science and Technology of Food Industry, xxxx, x(x): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025030391.

不同热加工-复热方式组合对鸡肉关键营养组分与氧化特性的影响

Effects of Different Combinations of Heat Processing-reheating Methods on Key Nutrient Components and Oxidation Characteristics of Chicken

  • 摘要: 本研究采用蒸、烤、炸三种加工方式与水浴、微波两种复热方式的组合实验设计,结合正交偏最小二乘判别分析(orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis,OPLS-DA),系统比较不同加工-复热组合对鸡胸肉营养与氧化特性的影响,以了解鸡胸肉营养与氧化变化规律。结果表明,在不同加工方式下,炸制鸡胸肉的硫代巴比妥酸反应物质含量显著高于蒸制与烤制鸡胸肉(P<0.05),α-螺旋含量降低、β-折叠含量增加,维生素E损失率低(12.90%~27.96%),且保留了更多的C18:1n-9c、C18:2n-6c、C20:0、C18:3n-6、C18:3n-3、C22:0、C23:0、C20:5n-3等脂肪酸(P<0.05);蒸制与烤制的蛋白质含量、维生素B6含量及C12:0、C20:1等脂肪酸、羰基含量显著高于炸制(P<0.05),其游离巯基含量显著低于炸制(P<0.05)。对比不同复热方式,蒸制-微波复热组合、烤制-微波组合的必需氨基酸与总氨基酸的比值、必需氨基酸与非必需氨基酸的比值、多不饱脂肪酸与饱和脂肪酸的比值、维生素B1、维生素B6、维生素E等含量显著高于蒸制-水浴复热组合、烤制-水浴组合,而炸制组合反之(P<0.05)。综上,炸制保留了更多的脂肪酸及脂溶性维生素,而蒸制与烤制保留了更多的蛋白质、水溶性维生素、稳定的饱和脂肪酸与相对稳定的单不饱和脂肪酸;从保持营养关键成分的角度分析,蒸制与烤制鸡胸肉适合微波复热,炸制鸡胸肉适合水浴复热。研究结果有助于了解鸡胸肉加工-复热过程中营养成分及氧化变化,从而为健康饮食的加工及复热方法提供科学的建议。

     

    Abstract: This study systematically investigated the effects of different cooking-reheating combinations (steaming, roasting, frying coupled with water bath or microwave reheating) on the nutritional and oxidative profiles of chicken breast using orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis (OPLS-DA). Results demonstrated that frying significantly elevated thiobarbituric acid reactive substances (TBARS) levels compared to steaming and roasting (P<0.05), accompanied by reduced α-helix and increased β-sheet content in proteins. Fried samples exhibited lower vitamin E loss (12.90%~27.96%) and retained higher levels of key fatty acids, including C18:1n-9c, C18:2n-6c, C20:0, C18:3n-6, C18:3n-3, C22:0, C23:0, and C20:5n-3 (P<0.05). In contrast, steamed and roasted samples showed superior protein content, vitamin B6 retention, and elevated levels of C12:0 and C20:1 fatty acids, alongside higher protein carbonyls and lower free sulfhydryl groups versus fried samples (P<0.05). Regarding reheating, microwave synergistic steam or roast reheated samples displayed significantly higher ratios of essential to total amino acids (EAA/TAA), essential to non-essential amino acids (EAA/NEAA), polyunsaturated to saturated fatty acids (PUFA/SFA), and greater retention of vitamins B1, B6, and E compared to water bath-reheated counterparts (P<0.05). Conversely, fried chicken breast retained higher nutritional quality when reheated via a water bath. Collectively, frying better preserves fatty acids and fat-soluble vitamins, while steaming and roasting favor protein integrity, water-soluble vitamins, and stable saturated/monounsaturated fatty acids. From the perspective of preserving key nutritional components, microwave reheating is recommended for steamed or roasted chicken breast, whereas water bath reheating optimizes fried samples. These findings elucidate the nutritional and oxidative dynamics during cooking-reheating processes, offering science-based insights that will enlighten and inform professionals about healthier dietary practices.

     

/

返回文章
返回