• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
马田田,肖哲非,欧阳杰,等. 热处理方式和时间对南极磷虾品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(9):1−8. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040260.
引用本文: 马田田,肖哲非,欧阳杰,等. 热处理方式和时间对南极磷虾品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(9):1−8. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040260.
MA Tiantian, XIAO Zhefei, OUYANG Jie, et al. Influence of Heat Treatment Methods and Time on the Quality of Antarctic KrillJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(9): 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040260.
Citation: MA Tiantian, XIAO Zhefei, OUYANG Jie, et al. Influence of Heat Treatment Methods and Time on the Quality of Antarctic KrillJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(9): 1−8. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040260.

热处理方式和时间对南极磷虾品质的影响

Influence of Heat Treatment Methods and Time on the Quality of Antarctic Krill

  • 摘要: 本研究旨在探究不同热处理方式(常压煮制、高压煮制、常压蒸制、高压蒸制、微波)及时间(2~10 min)对南极磷虾品质的影响。结果表明:在相同加热时间下,常压蒸制的热处理损失率最低,6 min内显著低于其他四种方式(P<0.05)。微波加热在粗蛋白、粗脂肪、虾青素含量、L*b*值及感官评分方面表现最佳,而常压煮制的a*值最高。随着加热时间延长,五种方式的热处理损失率均上升,6 min内差异显著(P<0.05);粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量均下降,6 min内与8 min以上无显著差异(P>0.05),6~8 min差异显著(P<0.05);虾青素含量和感官评分均先升后降,6 min时达到最高,6 min后显著下降(P<0.05);L*b*值上升,a*值下降,6~8 min色泽差异显著(P<0.05)。通过综合分析热处理方式和时间对磷虾各项品质指标的总体影响得出2~6 min优选微波加热,其次为高压蒸制;6~8 min微波加热和高压蒸制均较优;8 min及以上微波加热和常压蒸制表现更好。该研究为南极磷虾加工提供了理论依据,有助于优化加工流程、提升产品品质并推动产业发展。

     

    Abstract: This study aimed to investigate the effects of different heat treatment methods (atmospheric pressure cooking, high-pressure cooking, atmospheric pressure steaming, high-pressure steaming, and microwave) and time (2 to 10 minutes) on the quality of Antarctic krill. The results showed that under the same heating time, the heat treatment loss rate of atmospheric pressure steaming was the lowest, and it was significantly lower than the other four methods within 6 minutes (P<0.05). Microwave heating performed best in terms of crude protein, crude fat, astaxanthin content, L*, b* values, and sensory scores, while atmospheric pressure cooking had the highest a* value. As the heating time increased , the heat treatment loss rate of all five methods rose, and the differences were significant within 6 minutes (P<0.05); the contents of crude protein and crude fat decreased, and there was no significant difference between 6 minutes and 8 minutes or more (P>0.05), but the difference between 6 and 8 minutes was significant (P<0.05); the astaxanthin content and sensory scores first increased and then decreased, reaching the highest at 6 minutes, and then significantly decreased after 6 minutes (P<0.05); L* and b* values increased, while a* value decreased, and the color differences were significant between 6 and 8 minutes (P<0.05). Through a comprehensive analysis of the overall impact of heat treatment methods and time on various quality indicators of krill, it was concluded that microwave heating was preferred within 2 to 6 minutes, followed by high-pressure steaming; both microwave heating and high-pressure steaming were optimal within 6 to 8 minutes; and microwave heating and atmospheric pressure steaming performed better at 8 minutes or more. This study provides a theoretical basis for the processing of Antarctic krill, which is helpful for optimizing the processing flow, improving product quality, and promoting industrial development.

     

/

返回文章
返回