• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
李松,潘洪杰,章攀,等. 不同干燥方式对脆李果脯品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(8):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040319.
引用本文: 李松,潘洪杰,章攀,等. 不同干燥方式对脆李果脯品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(8):1−10. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040319.
LI Song, PAN HongJie, ZHANG Pan, et al. Influence of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Crispy Plum Preserved FruitsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(8): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040319.
Citation: LI Song, PAN HongJie, ZHANG Pan, et al. Influence of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Crispy Plum Preserved FruitsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(8): 1−10. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025040319.

不同干燥方式对脆李果脯品质的影响

Influence of Different Drying Methods on the Quality of Crispy Plum Preserved Fruits

  • 摘要: 为探索一种契合脆李果脯特性的干燥方法,本研究系统对比了热风恒温干燥(HD)、热风变温干燥(VHD)、热风-真空-热风干燥(CD)、真空冷冻干燥(VFD)这四种干燥方式对果脯干燥特性、感官品质、理化品质及抗氧化活性的影响,并深入分析各指标之间的相关性。结果表明:HD组、VHD组、CD组及VFD组的干燥时间分别为15、17、16及23 h,干燥速率均呈现先升高后降低的趋势。在9 h之前,HD组、VHD组及CD组的干燥速率均高于VFD组,而从11 h起,VFD组高于其他三组。感官评价中,VHD组评分最高(79.60分),VFD组的分值最低(73.20分)。VFD组的L*a*b*值显著高于其他处理组(P<0.05);其质构特性与皱缩率和VHD组无显著差异(P>0.05)。在理化品质方面,VHD的游离氨基酸含量最高(0.7105 g/100 g),总糖、总酚、黄酮及VC也均显著高于其他热风干燥组(P<0.05),分别为375.53、2.10、10.29 mg/g和2.20 mg/100 g。VFD组的抗氧化活性最强,其FRAP值为50.36 μmol Fe2+/g,羟自由基清除率为45.04%,ABTS+和DPPH自由基清除率均超过80%;VHD次之,FRAP值35.73 μmol Fe2+/g、羟自由基清除率41.75%、ABTS+自由基清除率77.29%、DPPH自由基清除率67.37%。相关性分析表明,L*a*b*与感官评价总分均呈现显著负相关趋势(P<0.05);果脯硬度与总糖、总酚及黄酮含量呈极显著负相关(P<0.01),而抗氧化性指标与三者呈显著正相关(P<0.05);游离氨基酸含量与a*r=−0.58,P<0.05)、维生素C含量呈显著负相关(r=−0.70,P<0.05)。综合指标与经济成本,VHD更适用于脆李果脯生产,为提升果脯工业化效率与品质提供了参考。

     

    Abstract: To explore a drying technique tailored to the characteristics of crisp plum preserves, this study systematically compared the effects of four drying methods—hot-air drying at constant temperature (HD), hot-air drying with variable temperature (VHD), hot-air-vacuum-hot-air drying (CD), and vacuum freeze drying (VFD)—on the drying characteristics, sensory quality, physicochemical properties, and antioxidant activity of the preserves. Additionally, a comprehensive analysis of the correlations between various indicators was conducted. The results indicated that all drying rates followed a pattern of initial increase followed by decrease, with the drying durations for the HD, VHD, CD, and VFD groups being 15, 17, 16 and 23 h, respectively. Within the first 9 h, the drying rate of the VFD group was lower than that of the HD, VHD, and CD groups. However, from 11 h onwards, the drying rate of the VFD group exceeded that of the other three groups. In sensory evaluation, the VHD group achieved the highest score (79.60 points), while the VFD group obtained the lowest (73.20 points). The L*, a*, and b* values of the VFD group were significantly higher than those of the other treatment groups (P<0.05), no significant differences were observed in textural properties or shrinkage rate between the VFD and VHD groups (P>0.05). Regarding physicochemical properties, the VHD group contained the highest level of free amino acids (0.7105 g/100 g). Its contents of total sugar, total phenols, flavonoids and vitamin C were significantly higher than those in other hot-air drying groups (P<0.05), at 375.53, 2.10, 10.29, and 2.20 mg/100 g, respectively. The VFD group showed the strongest antioxidant activity, with a FRAP value of 50.36 μmol Fe2+/g, a hydroxyl radical scavenging rate of 45.04%, and both ABTS+ and DPPH free radical scavenging rates exceeded 80%. The VHD group ranked second, with the corresponding indicators being 35.73 μmol Fe2+/g (FRAP), 41.75% (hydroxyl radical scavenging rate), 77.29% (ABTS+ free radical scavenging rates), and 67.37% (DPPH free radical scavenging rates), respectively. Correlation analysis demonstrated that the total sensory evaluation score was significantly negatively correlated with L*, a*, and b* values (P<0.05). The hardness of the preserves was highly significantly negatively correlated with the contents of total sugar, total phenols, and flavonoids (P<0.01), while antioxidant indicators were significantly positively correlated with these three components (P<0.05). Additionally, free amino acid content was significantly negatively correlated with a* (r=−0.58, P<0.05) and vitamin C content (r=−0.70, P<0.05). Considering comprehensive indicators and economic costs, VHD would be more suitable for the production of crisp plum preserves, providing a reference for enhancing their industrial efficiency and quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回