• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
李明娟,黄展文,张雅媛,等. 不同烹饪方式对荔浦芋品质及消化性能的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(7):41−52. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070074.
引用本文: 李明娟,黄展文,张雅媛,等. 不同烹饪方式对荔浦芋品质及消化性能的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(7):41−52. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070074.
LI Mingjuan, HUANG Zhanwen, ZHANG Yayuan, et al. Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Digestibility of Lipu TaroJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(7): 41−52. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070074.
Citation: LI Mingjuan, HUANG Zhanwen, ZHANG Yayuan, et al. Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Digestibility of Lipu TaroJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(7): 41−52. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070074.

不同烹饪方式对荔浦芋品质及消化性能的影响

Effects of Different Cooking Methods on the Quality and Digestibility of Lipu Taro

  • 摘要: 为探究烹饪方式对荔浦芋品质及消化特性的影响,本研究以荔浦芋为原料,采用煮制、蒸制、高压蒸制和烤制4种方式进行烹饪,测定了其食用品质、营养品质及体外消化性能,并采用变异系数法进行综合评分。结果表明:高压蒸制的荔浦芋感官评分、内聚性、胶着性、可恢复形变、蛋白质、脂肪、慢消化淀粉(slowly digestible starch,SDS)和综合评分最高,综合品质特性最佳;蒸制的荔浦芋膳食纤维、氨基酸总量(total amino acids,TAA)、必需氨基酸(essential amino acid,EAA) 、非必需氨基酸(non essential amino acid,NEAA)和呈味氨基酸含量最高,抗性淀粉(resistant starch, RS)含量最低;烤制的荔浦芋烹饪损失率、硬度、咀嚼性、弹性、总淀粉、灰分、碳水化合物、快消化淀粉(rapidly digestible starch,RDS)、RS、水解速率(hydrolysis rate, HR)和血糖指数预测值(predicted glycemic index,PGI)最高,水分和SDS含量最低,且褐变较为严重;煮制的荔浦芋烹饪损失率、感官评分、质构特性、基本营养成分、氨基酸含量、RDS、HR、PGI和综合评分最低,营养成分大量流失。综合分析,高压蒸制可更好地保持荔浦芋综合品质特性及烹饪效果,蒸制次之,而煮制的综合品质相对最差。

     

    Abstract: To explore the effects of cooking methods on the quality and digestibility of Lipu taro, Lipu taro was used as raw material to cooking by four methods including boiling, steaming, pressure cooking and roasting. Its edible quality, nutritional quality and in vitro digestibility were determined, and the comprehensive scores were evaluated by coefficient of variation method. The results showed that the Lipu taro processed by pressure cooking had the highest sensory score, cohesiveness, gumminess, recoverable deformation, protein, fat, slowly digestible starch (SDS), and comprehensive score, indicating the best overall quality. Steamed taro showed the highest amounts of dietary fiber, total amino acids (TAA), essential amino acids (EAA), non essential amino acid (NEAA), and flavor amino acid, while exhibiting the lowest resistant starch (RS) content. Lipu taro processed by roasting had the highest cooking loss rate, hardness, chewiness, elasticity, total starch, ash, carbohydrates, rapidly digestible starch (RDS), RS, hydrolysis rate (HR), and predicted glycemic index (PGI), but the lowest moisture and SDS content, along with severe browning. Boiled taro had the lowest cooking loss rate, sensory score, texture properties, basic nutritional components, amino acid content, RDS, HR, PGI, and comprehensive score, suggesting substantial nutrient loss. In summary, pressure cooking best preserved the overall quality properties and cooking performance of Lipu taro, followed by steaming, while boiling showed the poorest overall quality.

     

/

返回文章
返回