• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
李雪珂,周巧仪,马成英,等. 蝉茶的品质成分及香气特征分析J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(11):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070189.
引用本文: 李雪珂,周巧仪,马成英,等. 蝉茶的品质成分及香气特征分析J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(11):1−13. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070189.
LI Xueke, ZHOU Qiaoyi, MA Chengying, et al. Analysis of Quality Components and Aroma Characteristics of Cicada TeaJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(11): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070189.
Citation: LI Xueke, ZHOU Qiaoyi, MA Chengying, et al. Analysis of Quality Components and Aroma Characteristics of Cicada TeaJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(11): 1−13. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070189.

蝉茶的品质成分及香气特征分析

Analysis of Quality Components and Aroma Characteristics of Cicada Tea

  • 摘要: 本文以小绿叶蝉刺吸与未刺吸的金萱茶鲜叶为原料,通过系统比较分析其制成的蝉茶产品与对照茶产品(红茶/绿茶)在感官品质特征、主要生化成分及香气物质的差异,并分析其关键香气特征标志物。感官审评结果表明,蝉茶(红/绿茶)均表现出明显的花蜜香特征。生化成分结果表明,蝉绿茶的可溶性糖含量(4.75%~5.54%)均显著(P<0.05)高于对照绿茶(4.41%);蝉红茶的可溶性糖含量(4.76%~5.49%)均显著(P<0.05)高于对照红茶(4.17%)。蝉绿茶的总黄酮含量(4.88%~5.30%)均显著(P<0.05)高于蝉红茶(3.41%~4.49%);蝉绿茶的茶多酚含量(24.53%~25.18%)均显著(P<0.05)高于蝉红茶(14.36%~18.92%)。挥发性成分分析共鉴定出88种化合物,挥发性成分总量上,蝉茶高于对照茶样;此外,筛选出脱氢芳樟醇、邻伞花烃和苯甲醛为蝉绿茶与对照绿茶的特征香气物质;顺式芳樟醇氧化物(呋喃型)、香叶醇、苯乙醇、水杨酸甲酯、反式芳樟醇氧化物(吡喃型)及2-(5-甲基-5-乙烯基四氢呋喃-2-基)丙-2-基碳酸酯为区分蝉红茶与对照红茶的特征香气物质。ROAV分析表明,β-紫罗酮、苯甲醇、邻伞花烃、香叶醇等关键香气成分在蝉茶中的含量显著高于对照茶样(P<0.05),可能是蝉茶具有“蜜香”特征的关键香气成分。本研究解析了蝉茶特征风味的生化基础,可为蝉茶的品质提升提供理论支持。

     

    Abstract: In this study, fresh leaves of Jinxuan tea, both infested and uninfested with Empoasca onukii, were used as raw materials. A systematic comparison was conducted to analyze differences in the sensory quality characteristics, primary biochemical components, and aroma substances of cicada tea products and control tea products (black and green teas), leading to the identification of key aroma compounds. The sensory evaluation results indicated that the cicada tea exhibited distinct nectar-like aroma characteristics. The biochemical composition analysis revealed that the soluble sugar content of cicada green tea (4.75%~5.54%) was significantly higher than that of the control green tea (4.41%) (P<0.05). Similarly, the soluble sugar content of cicada black tea (4.76%~5.49%) was significantly greater than that of the control black tea (4.17%). The total flavonoid content of cicada green tea (4.88%~5.30%) was significantly higher than that of cicada black tea (3.41%~4.49%), whereas the tea polyphenol content of cicada green tea (24.53%~25.18%) was significantly greater than that of cicada black tea (14.36%~18.92%). A total of 88 volatile compounds were identified, with the total volatile components in cicada tea exceeding those in the control tea. Furthermore, dehydrolinalool, o-cymene, and benzaldehyde were identified as the characteristic aroma compounds that distinguished cicada green tea from the control green tea. Additionally, cis-linalool oxide (furan type), geraniol, phenylethanol, methyl salicylate, trans-linalool oxide (pyran type), and 2-(5-methyl-5-vinyl tetrahydrofuran-2-yl) propyl-2-yl carbonate were characteristic aromatic substances that differentiated cicada black tea from the control black tea. The relative odor activity value analysis indicated that key aroma components, such as β-ionone, benzyl alcohol, o-cymene, and geraniol, were present at significantly higher levels in the cicada tea than in the control tea (P<0.05), which may contribute to the distinctive “honey aroma” of cicada tea. In this study, the biochemical basis of the distinctive flavor of cicada tea was analyzed, and theoretical support for its quality enhancement was provided.

     

/

返回文章
返回