• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
魏佳仪,张渌淘,丁博文,等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对不同采收期枸杞芽菜品质综合评价J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(16):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070190.
引用本文: 魏佳仪,张渌淘,丁博文,等. 基于主成分分析和聚类分析对不同采收期枸杞芽菜品质综合评价J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(16):1−11. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070190.
WEI Jiayi, ZHANG Lutao, DING Bowen, et al. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable at Different Harvest Periods Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster AnalysisJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(16): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070190.
Citation: WEI Jiayi, ZHANG Lutao, DING Bowen, et al. Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable at Different Harvest Periods Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster AnalysisJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(16): 1−11. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025070190.

基于主成分分析和聚类分析对不同采收期枸杞芽菜品质综合评价

Comprehensive Quality Evaluation of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable at Different Harvest Periods Using Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

  • 摘要: 本研究以“宁杞菜1号”枸杞芽菜的5个采收期为试材,对其感官指标和理化指标进行测定分析,采用相关性、主成分和系统聚类分析,构建综合评价模型。结果表明:5个采收期枸杞芽菜感官指标及营养品质间存在不同程度的相关性,L*a*显著负相关、与b*显著正相关(P<0.05);总酚与褐变度显著正相关(P<0.05),蛋白质与叶绿素显著正相关、与水分显著负相关(P<0.05),水分与叶绿素呈非常显著负相关(P<0.01)。不同采收期枸杞芽菜的品质评价指标可由3个主成分表示,其累计方差贡献率为93.229%。系统聚类分析将5个采收期枸杞芽菜分为3类,分类结果与主成分综合评价结果基本一致。其中,第1类为:C1(5月采)和C2(6月采)硬度、弹性、咀嚼性、褐变度及水分指标高度相似,其硬度适中、弹性与咀嚼性协同匹配,褐变度低(色泽鲜亮)、水分含量高(芽菜鲜嫩),因此,可判断其表观品质可能更契合鲜食消费需求;第2类为:C3(7月采)在色泽、质构及总酚和甜菜碱含量等营养指标表现最优,C4(8月采)总黄酮、蛋白质含量突出,这两个时期营养品质表现更优秀,适合深加工;第3类为:C5(9月采):因其褐变度高、质地干硬、营养积累不足、水分流失严重,与其他样本差异显著,所以综合品质在整个采收期中处于劣势。本研究结果旨在揭示不同采收期对枸杞芽菜造成的质量影响,为后续枸杞芽菜的选取和加工以及产品质量均一化提供理论依据和数据支撑。

     

    Abstract: This study used Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable ‘Ningqicai No. 1’ harvested at five different stages as the experimental material. Sensory and physicochemical indices were measured and analyzed, and a comprehensive evaluation model was established using correlation analysis, principal component analysis, and hierarchical cluster analysis. The results showed that the sensory indices and nutritional quality of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable at different harvest stages were correlated to varying degrees. The L* value was significantly negatively correlated with a* and significantly positively correlated with b* (P<0.05). Total phenolic content was significantly positively correlated with browning degree (P<0.05). Protein content was significantly positively correlated with chlorophyll content and significantly negatively correlated with moisture content (P<0.05), while moisture content showed an extremely significant negative correlation with chlorophyll content (P<0.01).The quality evaluation indices of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable at the five harvest stages could be represented by three principal components, with a cumulative variance contribution rate of 93.229%. Hierarchical cluster analysis divided the five harvest stages into three groups, and the classification results were generally consistent with those of the principal component comprehensive evaluation. The first group included C1, harvested in May, and C2, harvested in June. These two stages showed high similarity in hardness, springiness, chewiness, browning degree, and moisture content. Their moderate hardness, coordinated springiness and chewiness, low browning degree, bright appearance, and high moisture content indicated tender texture and better visual quality, suggesting that they may be more suitable for fresh consumption.The second group included C3, harvested in July, and C4, harvested in August. C3 exhibited the best overall performance in color, texture, total phenolic content, and betaine content, while C4 showed prominent total flavonoid and protein contents. These two stages demonstrated superior nutritional quality and were therefore more suitable for further processing. The third group consisted of C5, harvested in September, which differed significantly from the other samples due to its high browning degree, dry and hard texture, insufficient nutrient accumulation, and severe moisture loss. Therefore, its comprehensive quality was relatively inferior among all harvest stages.Overall, this study revealed the effects of different harvest stages on the quality of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable, providing theoretical guidance and data support for raw material selection, subsequent processing, and quality standardization of Lycium barbarum L. Vegetable products.

     

/

返回文章
返回