• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
洪冰,胡婷婷,弓浩然,等. 河南小麦品种加工品质特性分析与综合评价J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(15):1−9. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093.
引用本文: 洪冰,胡婷婷,弓浩然,等. 河南小麦品种加工品质特性分析与综合评价J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(15):1−9. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093.
HONG Bing, HU Tingting, GONG Haoran, et al. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan ProvinceJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(15): 1−9. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093.
Citation: HONG Bing, HU Tingting, GONG Haoran, et al. Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan ProvinceJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(15): 1−9. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025080093.

河南小麦品种加工品质特性分析与综合评价

Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Processing Quality Characteristics of Wheat Varieties in Henan Province

  • 摘要: 为有效评价不同品种小麦品质的差异,以河南地区种植的18个不同小麦品种为研究对象,对其籽粒、面粉及面团品质特性进行分析,并结合相关性分析和主成分分析方法(PCA)建立一套综合评价模型。通过聚类分析对18个不同小麦品种进行分类,分析每类特点挖掘潜在应用价值。结果表明,小麦容重的变异系数最小(1.89%),形成时间的变异系数最大(78.96%)。其中有1个品种(新麦26)6项指标达到我国小麦品种品质分类标准强筋品质要求,7个品种达到中强筋品质要求。各品质性状间呈现不同程度的相关性,形成时间与面团稳定时间相关性最强(0.982)。通过主成分分析将14个评价指标简化为4个主成分,累计贡献率为82.005%,并对14个指标分别赋予权重得到综合品质前三的品种为新麦26、洛旱22、豫麦49,极具定向培育及开发加工价值。通过聚类分析将小麦分为三类:第Ⅰ类籽粒品质居中,面粉品质和面团品质最差,聚集了10个小麦品种;第Ⅱ类籽粒品质较差,面粉品质和面团品质居中,表明其磨粉品质较差,加工品质较好,聚集了6个小麦品种;第Ⅲ类聚集了2个小麦品种,籽粒品质和面粉品质最好,面团品质较好,表明其磨粉、加工品质及食用品质均较好。本研究结果为优质小麦品种的筛选、推广种植及加工产业发展提供了理论参考。

     

    Abstract: In order to effectively evaluate the quality differences among different wheat varieties, 18 varieties cultivated in the Henan region were selected as the research subjects. An analysis was conducted on their grain, flour, and dough quality characteristics. Furthermore, a comprehensive evaluation model was established by integrating correlation analysis and principal component analysis (PCA). Cluster analysis was used to classify 18 different wheat varieties, analyzing the characteristics and potential application value of each category. The results showed that the bulk density had the smallest coefficient of variation (1.89%), while the formation time had the largest (78.96%). One variety (Xinmai 26) met the quality standards for strong-gluten wheat in all six key indicators, and seven varieties met the standards for medium-strong gluten. Various quality traits exhibited different degrees of correlation, with the strongest correlation observed between development time and stability time (0.982). Principal component analysis simplified the 14 evaluation indicators into four principal components, with a cumulative contribution rate of 82.005%. Weighted scores based on these components identified the top three varieties with the best comprehensive quality: Xinmai 26, Luohan 22, and Yumai 49, indicating high value for targeted breeding and processing. Cluster analysis categorized the varieties into three groups: Group Ⅰ (10 varieties) exhibited moderate grain quality but the poorest flour and dough quality; Group Ⅱ (6 varieties) had poorer grain quality but moderate flour and dough quality, suggesting inferior milling but acceptable processing quality; Group Ⅲ (2 varieties) demonstrated the best grain and flour quality, along with good dough quality, indicating superior overall milling, processing, and end-use potential. This study provides a theoretical reference for selecting and promoting high-quality wheat varieties and for the development of the processing industry.

     

/

返回文章
返回