• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
夏瑶,郭俊齐,贾子璐,等. 制茶方式对绿茶挥发性成分的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(11):25−33. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090132.
引用本文: 夏瑶,郭俊齐,贾子璐,等. 制茶方式对绿茶挥发性成分的影响J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(11):25−33. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090132.
XIA Yao, GUO Junqi, JIA Zilu, et al. Influence of Tea Processing Methods on the Volatile Components of Green TeaJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(11): 25−33. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090132.
Citation: XIA Yao, GUO Junqi, JIA Zilu, et al. Influence of Tea Processing Methods on the Volatile Components of Green TeaJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(11): 25−33. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090132.

制茶方式对绿茶挥发性成分的影响

Influence of Tea Processing Methods on the Volatile Components of Green Tea

  • 摘要: 茶叶的挥发性成分是决定其感官品质的核心因素,而不同的制茶方式对茶叶香气物质的形成与保留具有显著影响。本研究以河南省舞钢市茶鲜叶为原料,通过传统手工与机械化加工两种方式制备绿茶,分析其挥发性香气成分的差异;结合感官审评、顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用(HS-SPME-GC-MS)、相对气味活度值(ROAV)分析等方法,探讨制茶方式对绿茶香气品质的影响。研究发现,传统手工制茶和机械化加工所得茶样感官品质均较优,手工茶样外形更平整,机械加工茶样汤色更明亮;传统手工制茶在保留醇类、酮类、醛类等关键香气物质方面更具优势,而机械化加工在酯类、萜类方面及工艺稳定性表现突出,关键香气成分分析显示,反-2-壬烯-1-醇和吲哚的ROAV在机械加工茶样中较高,而香叶醇、2,3-丁二酮、香叶基丙酮等在手工茶样中含量更高。研究结果表明传统手工制作的茶叶香气化合物种类和数量多于机械化加工的,但机械化加工其品质稳定性要优于手工制茶,该研究进一步丰富了茶叶加工的基础理论体系,为后续通过工艺改良实现手工与机械化加工优势互补、精准调控绿茶香气品质奠定了重要基础。

     

    Abstract: The volatile composition of tea is a key determinant of its sensory quality, with processing methods significantly influencing the formation and retention of aroma compounds. This study investigated the impact of traditional manual versus mechanized processing on the aroma profile of green tea produced from fresh leaves sourced from Wugang City, Henan Province. Sensory evaluation, headspace solid-phase microextraction coupled with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), and relative odor activity value (ROAV) analysis, differences in volatile components were systematically examined. Results indicated that both methods yielded tea samples with favorable sensory quality, with manually processed tea showing more uniform appearance and mechanically processed tea exhibiting brighter liquor color. Traditional manual processing was more effective in retaining key aroma compounds such as alcohols, ketones and aldehydes, while mechanized processing excelled in preserving esters, terpenes and offered higher process stability. ROAV-based analysis of key aroma components revealed higher levels of trans-2-nonen-1-ol and indole in mechanically processed tea, whereas geraniol, 2,3-butanedione, and geranyl acetone were more prominent in manually processed tea. These findings suggested that traditional processing yielded a richer diversity and concentration of aroma compounds, whereas mechanized processing ensured greater consistency in product quality. This study enhanced the theoretical understanding of tea processing and provided a foundation for optimizing green tea aroma quality by integrating the advantages of both manual and mechanized methods.

     

/

返回文章
返回