• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020

基于主成分分析与聚类分析的狼山鸡、城口山地鸡和爱拔益加肉鸡品质评价

Quality Evaluation of Langshan Chicken, Chengkou Mountain Chicken and Arbor Acres Broiler Based on Principal Component Analysis and Cluster Analysis

  • 摘要: 目的:本研究旨在利用多元统计学方法对不同品种黑羽鸡肉进行综合评价,为鸡肉品质评价标准的建立提供参考。方法:以两个特色黑羽地方鸡品种(狼山鸡、城口山地鸡)和对照肉鸡品种(爱拔益加白羽肉鸡)为研究对象,系统分析其上市日龄时质构特性、常规品质、营养成分和微量元素四大类22项指标,综合运用描述性分析、相关性分析、主成分分析和聚类分析等方法,比较不同品种肉鸡的品质差异并建立综合评价体系。结果:不同品种鸡肉品质差异较大,狼山鸡的质构特性(如内聚性、弹性等)、亮度(L*)显著低于城口山地鸡和爱拔益加肉鸡(P<0.05),但具有较高的红度值(a*)(P<0.05),爱拔益加(Arbor Acres,AA)肉鸡嫩度最高但系水力最低;营养品质方面,城口山地鸡和狼山鸡的蛋白质、肌苷酸及呈味氨基酸含量显著高于AA肉鸡(P<0.05),而AA肉鸡维生素A含量显著高于其他品种(P<0.05);微量元素方面,狼山鸡硒含量显著高于其他品种(P<0.05)。主成分分析提取了4个主成分,累计方差贡献率为80.1%,构建综合评价模型Z=0.59Z1+0.22Z2+0.12Z3+0.07Z4。综合得分表明,城口山地鸡和狼山鸡品质相近(0.400和0.401),显著优于AA肉鸡(−0.793)(P<0.05);公鸡肉质优于母鸡(P<0.05),在第一主成分和第二主成分得分图上可以清晰区分三个品种。聚类分析将36份鸡肉样品分为两大类,黑羽鸡一类,AA肉鸡一类,说明建立模型分级的可靠性。结论:不同遗传背景的鸡种(狼山鸡、城口山地鸡、AA肉鸡)在质构、营养和微量元素等多个维度上存在可量化的差异,建立的综合评价模型能有效区分不同品种的肉质特性。

     

    Abstract: Objective: This study aimed to conduct a comprehensive evaluation model for black-feathered broilers by multivariate statistical methods, providing a reference for establishment of chicken meat quality evaluation standards. Method: Two distinctive black-feathered indigenous chicken breeds (Langshan chicken and Chengkou mountain chicken) and the white-feathered commercial broiler Arbor Acres (AA) were selected as research subjects. A comprehensive analysis was conducted, systematically measuring 22 indicators across four categories: Texture properties, conventional qualities, nutritional components, and trace elements on the market age of the product. Multiple analytical approaches, including descriptive statistics, correlation analysis, principal component analysis (PCA), and cluster analysis (CA), were employed to compare quality differences among different chicken breeds and establish a comprehensive evaluation system. Results: Chicken quality varied considerably among breeds. The Langshan chicken exhibited significantly lower values in textural properties (such as cohesiveness and springiness) and lightness (L*) compared to the Chengkou Mountain chicken and Arbor Acres broilers (P<0.05), while it possessed a significantly higher redness (a*) value (P<0.05). AA broiler had the highest tenderness but the lowest water-holding capacity. Nutritional analysis indicated that Chengkou mountain chicken and Langshan chicken contained significantly higher protein, inosinic acid, and flavor-associated amino acids than AA broiler (P<0.05), whereas AA broiler had higher vitamin A content (P<0.05). For trace elements, Langshan chicken showed notably elevated selenium levels (P<0.05). PCA extracted four principal components, the cumulative variance was 80.1%, and the evaluation model was constructed as Z=0.59Z1+0.22Z2+0.12Z3+0.07Z4. The comprehensive scores demonstrated similar quality between Chengkou mountain chicken and Langshan chicken (0.400 vs. 0.401), both significantly outperforming Arbor Acres broiler (−0.793) (P<0.05). Meat from roosters generally surpassed hens in quality. PCA score plots of PC1 and PC2 clearly distinguished the three breeds. CA classified the 36 chicken samples into two major clusters, one comprising the black-feathered breeds and the other consisting of the Arbor Acres broilers, which demonstrates the reliability of the model-based grading. Conclusion: Chicken breeds with different genetic backgrounds (Langshan, Chengkou Mountain, and Arbor Acres) exhibited quantifiable differences across multiple dimensions, including texture, nutrition, and trace elements. The established comprehensive evaluation model effectively distinguished the meat quality characteristics among these breeds.

     

/

返回文章
返回