• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • 首都科技期刊卓越行动计划
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
赵丽丽,李怡晴,史宇婷,等. 基于E-nose、GC-IMS和HS-SPME-GC-MS解析不同品种辣椒油的风味组成差异J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(13):1−15. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090349.
引用本文: 赵丽丽,李怡晴,史宇婷,等. 基于E-nose、GC-IMS和HS-SPME-GC-MS解析不同品种辣椒油的风味组成差异J. 食品工业科技,2026,47(13):1−15. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090349.
ZHAO Lili, LI Yiqing, SHI Yuting, et al. Decoding Flavor Composition Differences of Chili Oils from Different Pepper Varieties Based on E-nose, GC-IMS, and HS-SPME-GC-MSJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(13): 1−15. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090349.
Citation: ZHAO Lili, LI Yiqing, SHI Yuting, et al. Decoding Flavor Composition Differences of Chili Oils from Different Pepper Varieties Based on E-nose, GC-IMS, and HS-SPME-GC-MSJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2026, 47(13): 1−15. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2025090349.

基于E-nose、GC-IMS和HS-SPME-GC-MS解析不同品种辣椒油的风味组成差异

Decoding Flavor Composition Differences of Chili Oils from Different Pepper Varieties Based on E-nose, GC-IMS, and HS-SPME-GC-MS

  • 摘要: 为系统解析宁夏羊角椒、陕西秦椒、贵州满天星、贵州灯笼椒和四川二荆条五种代表性辣椒油的风味组成差异,本研究采用电子鼻、顶空固相微萃取-气相色谱-质谱联用(headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry,HS-SPME-GC-MS)和气相色谱-离子迁移谱(GC-ion mobility spectrometry,GC-IMS)等多维检测技术,使用主成分分析(principal component analysis,PCA)、正交偏最小二乘判别分析(orthogonal partial least squares discrimination analysis,OPLS-DA)等化学计量学方法,结合气味活度值(odor activity value,OAV)确定关键差异香气化合物。结果表明:电子鼻PCA能够有效区分五种辣椒油样品,在W2S和W1W传感器上差异显著(P<0.05),表明不同辣椒油样品在醇类、醛类、酮类、无机硫化物和萜烯类化合物含量上存在明显区分;通过GC-IMS和HS-SPME-GC-MS在五种辣椒油中分别鉴定出41种和99种挥发性风味化合物,GC-IMS筛选出14种变量投影重要性(variable importance in projection,VIP)得分大于1的关键差异化合物,包括醛类6 种、酮类5种、醇类1种、酯类1种、芳香烃类1种,主要对果香、甜香、坚果、脂香和辛辣刺激气味有明显差异;HS-SPME-GC-MS筛选出17种VIP值>1且OAV>1的关键差异香气化合物,通过感官属性与关键差异香气化合物的相关性分析发现(E)-2-辛烯醛、甲硫基丙醛、茴香脑、2-戊基呋喃、5-甲基糠醛与坚果味、焦甜味和油脂味相近,己醛、庚醛、1-戊醇、(E)-2-己烯醛、苯甲醛、1-辛烯-3-醇、壬醛与油腻味和烟熏味相近,2,3-戊二酮、甲苯、2-乙基-6-甲基吡嗪、3-甲基丁醛、苯乙醛与生青味、辛辣味相近。综合来看,四川二荆条辣椒油的整体香气特征最佳,具有典型的肉香和甜香,主要来源于甲硫基丙醛、2-戊基呋喃和5-甲基糠醛的贡献;陕西秦椒辣椒油香气特征最为丰富,香辣气味浓郁,其典型气味主要来源于2-乙基-6-甲基吡嗪;贵州灯笼椒辣椒油具有独特的花香,主要来源于1-辛烯-3-醇和2,3-戊二酮的贡献;而贵州满天星和宁夏羊角椒辣椒油的香气特征均不明显,表明二者感官品质相对较弱。本研究通过揭示不同品种辣椒油呈香特性的组成差异,旨在为高品质辣椒油的风味导向开发和质量控制提供理论依据。

     

    Abstract: To systematically analyze the differences in flavor composition among five representative chili oils made from Ningxia Yangjiaojiao, Shaanxi Qinjiao, Guizhou Mantianxing, Guizhou Denglongjia and Sichuan Erjingtiao peppers, this study employed multi-dimensional detection techniques, including electronic nose (E-nose), headspace-solid phase microextraction-gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS), and gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (GC-IMS). Chemometric approaches such as principal component analysis (PCA) and orthogonal partial least squares-discrimination analysis (OPLS-DA) were applied, combined with odor activity values (OAV) to identify key differential aroma compounds. The results demonstrated that PCA based on E-nose data could effectively distinguished the five chili oil varieties, with significant differences (P<0.05) observed in the responses of W2S and W1W sensors, indicating notable variations in the content of alcohols, aldehydes, ketones, inorganic sulfides, and terpenes. A total of 41 and 99 volatile compounds were identified in the five chili oils via GC-IMS and HS-SPME-GC-MS, respectively. Among them, 14 key differential compounds with variable importance in projection (VIP)>1 were screened from GC-IMS, including 6 aldehydes, 5 ketones, 1 alcohol, 1 ester, and 1 aromatic hydrocarbon, which contributed significantly to fruity, sweet, nutty, fatty, and pungent notes. From HS-SPME-GC-MS, 17 key differential aroma compounds with both VIP>1 and OAV>1 were identified. Correlation analysis between sensory attributes and key differential aroma compounds revealed that (E)-2-octenal, methional, anethole, 2-pentylfuran, and 5-methylfurfural were closely associated with nutty, caramelized sweet, and fatty notes; hexanal, heptanal, 1-pentanol, (E)-2-hexenal, benzaldehyde, 1-octen-3-ol, and nonanal were correlated with greasy and smoky notes; while 2,3-pentanedione, toluene, 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine, 3-methylbutanal, and phenylacetaldehyde were correlated with green and pungent notes. Overall, the Sichuan Erjingtiao chili oil exhibited the best overall aroma profile, characterized by typical meaty and sweet notes, primarily attributed to methional, 2-pentylfuran, and 5-methylfurfural. The Shaanxi Qinjiao chili oil displayed the richest aroma characteristics with a strong spicy fragrance, mainly derived from 2-ethyl-6-methylpyrazine. The Guizhou Denglongjiao chili oil exhibited a unique floral aroma, largely contributed by 1-octen-3-ol and 2,3-pentanedione. In contrast, the Guizhou Mantianxing and Ningxia Yangjiaojiao chili oils showed less distinct aroma characteristics, indicating relatively weaker sensory qualities. By elucidating the compositional differences in aroma characteristics of chili oils from different pepper varieties, this study aims to provide a theoretical foundation for the flavor-oriented development and quality control of high-quality chili oils.

     

/

返回文章
返回