• 中国科技期刊卓越行动计划项目资助期刊
  • 中国精品科技期刊
  • EI
  • Scopus
  • CAB Abstracts
  • Global Health
  • 北大核心期刊
  • DOAJ
  • EBSCO
  • 中国核心学术期刊RCCSE A+
  • 中国科技核心期刊CSTPCD
  • JST China
  • FSTA
  • 中国农林核心期刊
  • 中国开放获取期刊数据库COAJ
  • CA
  • WJCI
  • 食品科学与工程领域高质量科技期刊分级目录第一方阵T1
中国精品科技期刊2020
黎梓杭,何芊沂,林捷,等. 复热方式对冻藏鸡胸肉制品品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2025,46(18):283−290. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024100083.
引用本文: 黎梓杭,何芊沂,林捷,等. 复热方式对冻藏鸡胸肉制品品质的影响J. 食品工业科技,2025,46(18):283−290. doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024100083.
LI Zihang, HE Qianyi, LIN Jie, et al. Effect of Reheating Methods on the Quality of Frozen-stored Chicken Breast ProductsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(18): 283−290. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024100083.
Citation: LI Zihang, HE Qianyi, LIN Jie, et al. Effect of Reheating Methods on the Quality of Frozen-stored Chicken Breast ProductsJ. Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2025, 46(18): 283−290. (in Chinese with English abstract). doi: 10.13386/j.issn1002-0306.2024100083.

复热方式对冻藏鸡胸肉制品品质的影响

Effect of Reheating Methods on the Quality of Frozen-stored Chicken Breast Products

  • 摘要: 采用蒸汽、微波、空气炸以及红外-微波四种复热方式对冻藏调理鸡肉进行复热加工,以探究复热方式对调理鸡肉品质的影响。通过测定复热后鸡肉的升温曲线、水分含量、pH、颜色、蛋白质氧化程度、风味、质构参数并进行感官评价,综合确定最适用于消费者的复热方式。结果表明:复热方式对调理鸡肉的水分含量影响不显著(P>0.05),空气炸复热组的鸡肉由于美拉德反应充分导致肉色较黄,生成较多的小分子物质,蛋白质氧化程度显著低于其余复热组(P<0.05),氮氧化物以及醛酮醇类等小分子风味物质显著高于其余复热组(P<0.05),风味最佳,硬度以及咀嚼性分别为2846.69±35.66 g和628.85±50.80,感官综合评分达到8.45分,优于其他复热组。而微波以及红外-微波两种复热方法速度快,各项指标比较均衡。蒸汽复热时间长,总羰基和总巯基含量分别为7.15±1.13 nmol/mg和4.53±0.10 μmol/g,蛋白质氧化程度高,小分子风味物质散失严重,硬度以及咀嚼性最高,分别为3581.94±31.15 g和1034.46±59.10,感官评分为6.83分,排名最后。综上所述,空气炸复热是最适用于调理鸡肉的复热方式。

     

    Abstract: The study assessed the effects of four reheating approaches, namely steam, microwave, air frying, and infrared-microwave, on the quality attributes of prepared chicken breast after frozen storage. Aiming to identify the optimal reheating approach for end-user consumers, parameters including temperature rising curves, water content, pH, color, protein oxidation, flavor profile, texture, and sensory qualities, were synthetically analyzed. The findings revealed no significant variances of water content were among the reheating methods (P>0.05). Air frying led to more yellowness due to Maillard reactions, while small-molecule compounds generated along with significantly lower levels of protein oxidation (P<0.05) and higher concentrations of nitrogenous, aldehyde/ketone compoundsand and other small molecular flavor substances (P<0.05). These characteristics contribute to superior flavor of reheated chicken breast. The hardness and chewness were 2846.69±35.66 g and 628.85±50.80, respectively. The sensory comprehensive score reached 8.45 points, which was better than other reheating groups. Microwave and infrared-microwave enabled rapid reheating and well-balanced chicken quality, whereas steam of long reheating time resulted in marked protein oxidation (total carbonyl: 7.15±1.13 nmol/mg, total thiol: 4.53±0.10 μmol/g), small molecular severe flavor deterioration, and the highest hardness and chewiness values (3581.94±31.15 g and 1034.46±59.10, respectively). The sensory score was 6.83, ranking last. In summary, air frying is the most appropriate approach to reheat prepared chicken breast.

     

/

返回文章
返回